Abstract:Legislations concerning emissions from heavy-duty diesel engines are becoming increasingly stringent. This requires conventional diesel combustion to be compliant using costly and sophisticated aftertreatment systems. Preferably, diesel–methanol dual-fuel is one of the suitable alternative combustion modes as it can potentially reduce the formation of nitrogen oxide and soot emissions which characterised the diesel mixing-controlled combustion. This is primarily due to the high latent heat of vaporisation and oxygen content of the methanol fuel. At high engine loads, however, the potential of diesel–methanol dual-fuel operation is constrained by the excessive combustion pressure rise rate and peak in-cylinder pressure, which limits both the engine efficiency and the percentage of methanol that can be used. For the first time, experimental studies were conducted to explore advanced combustion control strategies such as Miller cycle, exhaust gas recirculation, and intake air cooling for improving upon high load diesel–methanol dual-fuel combustion. Experiments were carried out at 1200 r/min and 18 bar indicated mean effective pressure on a single-cylinder heavy-duty diesel engine, which equipped with a high pressure common rail diesel injection, a methanol port fuel injection, and a variable valve actuation system on the intake camshaft. Results showed that the methanol energy fraction of a conventional diesel–methanol dual-fuel operation with a baseline intake valve closing timing was limited to 28%. This was due to the high combustion temperature at a high load which advanced the ignition timing of the premixed charge, resulting in high levels of pressure rise rate. The application of lower effective compression ratio and intake air temperature ( T int ) effectively decreased the compression temperature, which successfully delayed the ignition timing of the premixed charge. This allowed for a more advanced diesel injection timing to achieve improvement in the thermal efficiency and potentially enabled a higher methanol substitution ratio. Although the introduction of exhaust gas recirculation demonstrated very slight impact on the ignition timing of the premixed charge, a higher net indicated efficiency was observed due to a relatively lower local combustion temperature which reduced heat transfer loss. Moreover, the optimised diesel–methanol dual-fuel operation allowed a higher methanol energy fraction of 40% to be used at an effective compression ratio of 14.3 and T int of 305 K and achieved the highest net indicated efficiency of 47.4%, improving by 3.7% and 2.6%, respectively, when compared to the optimised conventional diesel combustion (45.7%) and conventional diesel–methanol dual-fuel (46.2%). This improvement was accompanied with a reduction of 37% in nitrogen oxide emissions and little impact on soot emissions in comparison with the conventional diesel combustion.

Performance of a Methanol/Diesel Dual Fuel Engine

Engine Performance and Emissions of A Compression Ignition Engine Operating on the Diesel-Methanol Blends

Combustion and Emission Characteristics of a DI Diesel Engine Fueled by Diesel-Methanol Blends

Performance and Emissions of A Diesel Engine Fuelled with Methanol

Study on Combustion Characteristics of a Methanol—diesel Dual-Fuel Compression Ignition Engine

Study on Combustion Characteristics of a DI Diesel Engine Operating on Diesel/Methanol Blends

A comparative study of combustion and emission characteristics of dual-fuel engine fueled with diesel/methanol and diesel–polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether blend/methanol

Experimental Study on Operating Region of a Methanol/Diesel Dual Fuel Engine

Effects of Methanol Addition on the Combustion Process of the Methanol/Diesel Dual-Fuel Based on an Optical Engine

Combustion and Emission Characteristics of a DI Engine Operating on High Proportion of Methanol-Diesel Dual Fuel

Effect of Pilot Diesel Quantity and Fuel Delivery Advance Angle on the Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Methanol-Fueled Diesel Engine

Effects of Diesel Injection Timing and Methanol Substitution Ratio on Combustion and Exhaust Emission Characteristics of a Dual Fuel Compression Ignition Engine

Experimental study on effects of pilot injection strategy on combustion and emission characteristics of diesel/methanol dual-fuel engine under low load

Optimization of methanol/diesel dual-fuel engines at low load condition for heavy-duty vehicles to operated at high substitution ratio by using single-hole injector for direct injection of methanol

Orthogonal Test on Intake Methanol Ratio of Methanol/Diesel Dual Fuel Engine

Parametric Study on Effects of Methanol Injection Timing and Methanol Substitution Percentage on Combustion and Emissions of Methanol/diesel Dual-Fuel Direct Injection Engine at Full Load

Exploring the high load potential of diesel–methanol dual-fuel operation with Miller cycle, exhaust gas recirculation, and intake air cooling on a heavy-duty diesel engine

Effect of Pilot Diesel Quantity on the Performance and Emissions of Dual Fuel Engine Operating with Methanol and Diesel

In-depth Comparison of Methanol Port and Direct Injection Strategies in a Methanol/diesel Dual Fuel Engine

Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Methanol–Diesel Dual Fuel Engine at Different Altitudes

Investigation into the Operating Range of a Dual-Direct Injection Engine Fueled with Methanol and Diesel