Relationship between body surface area and bone strength in middle and old age women

刘石平,伍贤平,廖二元,戴如春,彭健
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2004.30.082
2004-01-01
Abstract:Aim: To investigate the relationship between body surface area (BSA) and speed of sound (SOS) and the relative risk of osteoporosis (OP). Methods: One thousand five hundred and ninty-six females ranging from 12 to 96 years of age were measured the speed of sound (SOS) at the midshaft of the non-dominant tibia with a quantitative ultrasound device. Data were analyzed in age groups divided by intervals of 5 years to determine the peak SOS and the age of peak SOS. BSA related variations in tibial SOS were assessed with regression analysis. Partial correlation coefficients (controlling for age) were calculated and multiple regression analysis was used between tibial SOS and parameters of height, mass, index of body mass and BSA. Data after the age of peak SOS were analyzed in groups divided by the Mean ± SD of BSA to examine the impact of BSA on tibial SOS in our middle-aged and elderly women. The prevalence of osteoporosis was compared among different BSA groups. The relative risk and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and compared. Results: Significant dependency was found between tibial SOS and height, body mass and BSA. The peak SOS at the tibia [(3 991 ± 68)m/s] occurred in the 35 to 39 year old group. The curve representing the SOS change according to BSA in women aged 40 years was the best fitting, using regression analysis of the quadratic model; SOS=914.28 + 3 498.91 (BSA) -1013.20 (BSA) 2(R 2 = 0.131, P=0.000). Multiple regression analyses showed that body mass, BSA and body mass index were significant determinants of tibial SOS (R 2 = -1.759, 1.250, 0.740 respectively). The differences of tibial SOS and prevalence of osteoporosis were statistically significant between the large BSA group and the small BSA group. Relative risks (RR) and 95% CI for osteoporosis increased with BSA declining (RR = 3.16, 95% CI 3.15 to 6.51, (1.403 m 2 vs 1.403 to 1.649 m 2; RR = 5.31, 95% CI 4.26 to 15.13, (1.403 m 2 vs (1.649 m 2). Compared with the total reference population (after the age of peak value of tibial SOS), the small and intermediate BSA groups, the likelihood of suffering from osteoporosis declined by 53%, 81% and 41% respectively in the large BSA group. Conclusion: The parameters of height including mass, BSA and body mass index have significant impact on bone strength and are the strongest predictors of bone strength in middle and old age women. Small BSA is indicated as an important risk factor for osteoporosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?