A randomized, double-blinded, double-modelling and controlled clinical and bacteriological evaluation of erythromycin cyclic 11,12-carbonate in the treatment of bacterial infection compared with roxithromycin

谭伟,侯杰,陈旭岩,陈亦芳,张慧琳
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8689.2003.04.011
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of erythromycin cyclic 11, 12-carbonate in the treatment of bacterial infection of respiratory system and skin. Methods: A multi-centered, randomized, doubleblinded, double-modelling and controlled clinical trial were adopted with roxithromycin as control. Erythromycin cyclic 11, 12-carbonate tablets: 250-500mg twice daily; Roxithromycin tablets: 150-300mg twice daily. The duration was 5-10 days. Results: The overall clinical effective rates of experimental group (28 cases) and controlled group (29 cases) were 85.71% and 82.76% respectively; the bacterial clearance rates were 76% and 83.33%; the bacterial sensitivity rates were 89.36% and 72.34%; adverse reaction rates were 12.1% and 12.5%. No statistical difference between the two groups showed. Conclusion: Erythromycin cyclic 11, 12-carbonate was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute bacterial infection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?