Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on Teicoplanin Versus Vancomycin

吕芳芳,周志慧,俞云松,郑经川,陈亚岗,顾俊明,王慧玲,霍丽,李卓,薛欣,熊盏道,刘谨,赵建平,徐永建,张珍祥
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-6821.2002.04.001
2002-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To Evaluate the efficacy and safety of teicoplanin. METHODS: The patients received teicoplanin intravenously once daily at 400mg in the first day, 200mg from the second day and the doses were double for the patients with severe infections, or vancomycin at 0.5g three times daily and 1.0g twice daily for the patients with severe infections. The treatment duration was 7-14 days. RESULTS: The effective rate and cure rate were 87.10% (54/62) and 74.19%(46/62)in teicoplanin group, while in vancomycin group were 90.32%(56/62)and 61.29%(38/62) respectively. The bacterial elimination rate was 94.74%(54/57) in teicoplanin group and 88.52%(54/61) in vancomycin group. Adverse reactions occurred in 11.29%(7/62) of patients in teicoplanin group and 6.45%(4/62) in vancomycin group. There were no statistically differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Teicoplanin is an effective and safe agent for treating moderate and severe gram positive bacterial infections.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?