A Clinical Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Late-course Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

李平,刘成文,张洪,杨玉琼,徐泳,艾平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-173X.2002.04.043
2002-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the preliminary therapeutic efficacy and acute radiation toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus late-course hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (LCHART) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: Forty-three in-patients with pathological diagnosis of nonmetastatic (MO) NPC from September 1999 to September 2000 were randomized into two groups: one was treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by LCHART (study group, n = 23); the other was treated by conventional fractionation radiotherapy (control group, n = 20); additionally, adjuvant chemotherapy given repeatedly every 3 weeks for 3-4 cycles to both groups was initiated 1 month after radiotherapy. The chemotherapy included Cisplatin 30mg/m2 dl-3 and 5-Fu 500mg/m2 dl-5. The radiotherapy (RT) consisted of two phases: 36. 0-40. 0Gy in 18-20 fraction over 3. 5-4 weeks as phase-I RT using conventional technique was delivered with two lateral opposing faciocervical fields and an anterior field of lower neck in the two groups, and then 28. 0-32. 0Gy in 20 fraction over 2 weeks was administered as phase II RT using LCHART technique (1. 4-1. 6Gy per fraction, twice daily with interval ≥6 hours) in the study group and the same doses using conventional radiation technique (2. 0Gy per fraction once daily) in the control group to the primary tumor with the shrinking-field (two lateral-opposing facial fields) to avoid excessive irradiation to the spinal cord. Results: All study patients went through completely the therapeutic regimen without interruption of radiotherapy. LCHART was associated with significantly more severe mucositis (grade 3-4 oral mucositis was 47. 8%), compared with that of 20% in the conventional fractionation radiotherapy (P<0. 05). No significant difference in acute toxicity of skin and hematology was seen between LCHART and conventional fractionation radiotherapy (P>0. 05). The nasopharyngeal and cervical lesion complete response rate was 78. 26& for the treatment group and 65. 00% for the control group (P>.05) at the end of immediately after radiotherapy. Three months and six months after radiotherapy, the tumor complete response rates were 95. 65% vs 70. 00% (P<0. 05) and 95. 65% vs 75. 00% (P <0. 05) respectively between the study group and control group. Six months after radiotherapy, the tumor complete response rate of locally advanced NPC was 92. 13% for the study group and 50. 00% for the control group (P<0. 05). Conclusion: In comparison with conventional fractionation radiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus LCHART has the advantage of bringing NPC under local control, especially in locally advanced NPC, and its acute radiation toxicity is tolerable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?