PO-0638: Phase III Randomized Trial of CCRT Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy for NPC

P.J. Lin,Y.C. Liu,W.Y. Wang,J.C. Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(15)40630-9
IF: 6.901
2015-01-01
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Abstract:Purpose/Objective: This randomized phase III trial compared clinical outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (NeoCT-RT) in patients with advanced nasopharygeal carcinoma (NPC).Materials and Methods: A total of 256 NPC patients with 2002 AJCC stage II-IVB were randomized to CCRT or NeoCT-RT.Both arms received IMRT with similar dosage and fractionation.The regimen of chemotherapy were concurrent PF (two cycles of concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day + 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2/day, 96-hour continuous infusion during the first and 5th week) or neoadjuvant P-FL (cisplatin 60 mg/m2 D1 and 5-FU 2500 mg/m2 + Leucovorin 250 mg/m2 D8, repeated every 2 weeks for 5 cycles).Post-radiation adjuvant chemotherapy using oral tegafur-uracil was recommended to patients with highrisk factors for one year in both arms.Results: Baseline patient characteristics were comparable in both arms.NeoCT-RT has better Complete response rates, evaluated 2-3 months after radiotherapy than CCRT (96.1% vs. 85.0%,P=0.0047).Acute toxicity during radiotherapy period revealed a significant reduction of grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting, mucositis, dermatitis, and weight loss in the NeoCT-RT arm.After a minimal follow-up of 60 months, 26.8% (34/127) and 23.3% (30/129) patients in CCRT and Neo-RT groups developed tumor relapse respectively.The overall survival (5-year rate, 81.6% vs. 85.3%,P=0.1967) and progression-free survival (5-year rate, 74.0% vs. 78.9%,P=0.3807) were similar in both arms.Conclusions: NeoCT-RT has a higher initial complete response rate and less grade 3/4 acute toxicities during radiotherapy but has similar survivals compared with CCRT in patients with advanced NPC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?