Lidar Remote Sensing of Seawater Optical Properties: Experiment and Monte Carlo Simulation
Dong Liu,Peituo Xu,Yudi Zhou,Weibiao Chen,Bing Han,Xiaolei Zhu,Yan He,Zhihua Mao,Chengfeng Le,Peng Chen,Haochi Che,Zhipeng Liu,Qun Liu,Qingjun Song,Sijie Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2926891
IF: 8.2
2019-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Abstract:Detecting the vertical profile of optical properties is an important task in the remote sensing of the upper ocean, especially for 3-D reconstruction. Ocean color remote sensing can only provide surface information, while the light detection and ranging (lidar) technique can provide depth-resolved data. Lidar can provide global-scale observations of the upper ocean for days and nights with minimal atmospheric correction errors. Unfortunately, due to the strong multiple scattering effects that occur when light propagates in seawater, the simple lidar equation may cause some deviations between the actual measurements and the simulation of the lidar signals. In this paper, we present a shipborne oceanic lidar, which was developed to detect the optical properties of seawater. For evaluating the performance of the lidar system, a Monte Carlo (MC) model was established to simulate lidar signals based on the simultaneous
<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">in situ</italic>
inherent optical properties of seawater. The lidar measurements and the MC simulation can provide both the lidar signals and the retrieved lidar attenuation coefficient
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\alpha $ </tex-math></inline-formula>
. The results of the comparison indicate that the lidar-measured signals correspond well with the MC-simulated signals at different experiment stations in the
<italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Yellow Sea</italic>
and at various receiving fields of view (FOVs). We also observed strong correlations between the lidar-measured
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\alpha $ </tex-math></inline-formula>
and MC-simulated
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\alpha $ </tex-math></inline-formula>
at different stations (
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$r = 0.95$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
) and at various FOVs (
<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$r = 0.96$ </tex-math></inline-formula>
). The results indicate the reliability of the developed lidar system.