Introduction of a Small Volume Ethyl Acetate based Liquid-Liquid Extraction Procedure for Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Wastewater by Atmospheric Pressure Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Evaluation of Method Greenness
Dnyaneshwar Shinde,Vijayakumar Murugan,Urvikkumar Dhagat,Parth Gupta,Raghu Tadala,Bhaskar Karubothula,Iwona Golebiewska,Samara Bin Salem,Wael Elamin,Grzegorz Brudecki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465563
IF: 4.601
2024-12-01
Journal of Chromatography A
Abstract:The Small Volume Ethyl Acetate based Liquid-Liquid Extraction (SVEA-LLE) method, using Atmospheric Pressure Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (APGC-MS/MS) with Dual Head Robotic Tool Change (DH-RTC) Prep and Load (PAL) autosampler, was evaluated for the analysis of 17 PAHs in water and wastewater. The extraction method was first evaluated for extraction efficiency with respect to time using a one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the effect of acidification. Method validation was performed as per SANTE/11312/2021 v2 2024 for analysis of PAHs in wastewater. Linearity was determined over a range of 5 to 80 ng/ml, meeting the acceptable coefficient of determination (r 2 ) and the values of % deviation from back-calculated concentration. The method was observed to be sensitive enough, as the estimated Limits of Detection (LOD) and Quantification (LOQ) were observed to be lower than or close to the Limits specified in EPA 625.1/2016 method, without the need for evaporative concentration. During the method validation trials, it was observed that 82.71 % of the observations were below 10 % RSD, 14.19 % were in the range of 10 % to 15 % RSD, and 3.08 % were between 15 % and 20 % RSD (n=6). Similarly, in the case of mean % recovery, 92.59 % of the observations were between 80 to 120 % recovery, 3.70 % of the observations were between 70 to 80 % recovery, 3.08 % of the observations were 120 to 130 % recovery (n=6). It was observed that mean % recovery of robustness study (n=18) ranged from 90.21 to 117.82 (observed for phenanthrene and benzo (a) pyrene respectively). Further, the % RSD from robustness study ranged between 5.11 to 18.98 (observed for acenaphthylene and pyrene respectively). Measurement Uncertainty of all the analytes ranged from 3.73 to 8.92 % (observed for fluorene and pyrene, respectively). The method described has been observed to be fit for purpose, as it meets the method validation requirements with acceptable results in PT participation. The greenness assessment of the method using tools like the Analytical Eco-Scale (AES) and the Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) indicated that method ranks excellent in greenness evaluation and is eco-friendly. The optimized sample preparation method is short, safe, and easy with an extract suitable for direct injection onto GC column, eliminating the concentration and reconstitution steps for high-throughput analysis of PAHs in water and wastewater.
chemistry, analytical,biochemical research methods