[Reliability of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression in Breast Cancer Evaluated by Immunohistochemistry].

Chong-shan Gu,Min Ying,Ying-jian He,Yi-qiang Liu,Bin Dong,Tao Ouyang,Ai-ping Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.32.010
2013-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the reliability of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) expression in breast cancer by immunohistochemistry and discuss their influencing factors.METHODS:The pretreatment biopsy specimens were collected from 148 patients (from Beijing Cancer Hospital between 2004 to 2010) with invasive breast cancer. After reslicing and staining (ER:SP1, PR: 1E2, HER-2: 4B5), the status of ER, PR and HER-2 was analyzed by a pathological expert with automated imaging system Ariol MB-8. And their results were compared with the original reports.RESULTS:The concordance rates between original reports and automated image system were ER:76.35%, PR:49.32%, HER-2:63.51% while Kappa values 0.12 (P = 0.020) , 0.18 (P = 0.002) and 0.08 (P = 0.200) respectively. And the concordance rates between expert reports and automated image system were ER:93.92%, PR:81.08% and HER-2:76.35% while Kappa values 0.77 (P < 0.001) , 0.67 (P < 0.001) and 0.32 (P < 0.001) respectively.CONCLUSION:For the expressions of ER, PR and HER-2, the disaccording results of original reports and automated image system may be mainly due to the differences of antibodies, staining methods and interpretations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?