Abstract:Exploring the conditions under which cooperation can emerge in populations has long been a subject for humans. Fair preference psychology has been incorporated into the analytical framework of the public goods game. Based on considering the dynamic update of trust-driven investment willingness, we introduce a dynamic payoff allocation mechanism and loners to traditional PGG, explaining how the mechanism related to fairness preferences promotes cooperation. We assume that payoffs are equally allocated among players when the payoffs do not exceed the threshold. Otherwise, the excess portion is proportionally allocated according to the investment willingness of cooperators. The effects of parameter changes on the evolution of cooperation are investigated by conducting Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that introducing dynamic payoff allocation and loners can effectively promote cooperation in a specific range of parameters. Specifically, the existence of loners is a double-edged sword. Loners can prevent players from adopting defection behaviors on a large scale when the payoff of cooperation is unsatisfied and inhibit the emergence and diffusion of cooperative strategies as the payoff of cooperators increases. When the payoff of cooperation is dissatisfactory, the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism can promote the average investment willingness of cooperators to accelerate the spread of cooperation. However, the payoff reallocation coefficient should not be set too high, and a high-level threshold of payoff reallocation may lead to the failure of the dynamic payoff allocation mechanism. There is an optimal payoff reallocation coefficient to maximize the efficiency of the proposed mechanism. Moreover, the optimal payoff reallocation coefficient that can maximize the cooperation level is distinct for the diverse combination of enhancement factor and loss aversion coefficient. However, its value should be set at a low level in general. These results may help researchers better understand the evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation from a fairness preference perspective.

The Influence of Age-Driven Investment on Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Age-related vitality of players promotes the evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game

Cooperation in a generalized age-structured spatial game

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Effect of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game.

Cooperation Transition of Spatial Public Goods Games

Discreet investors exert greater influence on cooperation in the public goods game

Particle swarm optimization with historical return decay enhances cooperation in public goods games with investment risks

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Groups

Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with dynamic resource allocation: A fairness preference perspective

Selective Investment Promotes Cooperation in Public Goods Game

Emergence of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game with Conditional Participation

Evolution of Public Cooperation with Weighted and Conditional Strategies

Reputation-based Mutual Selection Rule Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Threshold Public Goods Games

Evolution of Cooperation among Game Players with Non-Uniform Migration Scopes

Interaction Stochasticity May Hinder Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game

Spatial Structure Favors Cooperative Behavior in the Snowdrift Game with Multiple Interactive Dynamics

Social Influence Promotes Cooperation in the Public Goods Game

Heterogeneous investment promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game on hypergraphs

Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with segregated networks and periodic invasion