Abstract:<p>This paper investigates the institutional origins of ownership discrimination in bank lending through a staggered quasi-natural experiment: China's Split-share Structure Reform. State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) have an advantage over non-SOEs in securing external financing to protect investment opportunities from cash flow fluctuations. This financing privilege declined significantly after the reform, which mandatorily converted SOEs' non-tradable state-owned shares into tradable shares, sharply increasing the likelihood of further privatization. Consistent evidence also exists in terms of bank lending behaviors. Further, we show both direct and indirect evidence that the effects were more pronounced among SOEs under higher threats of privatization (<em>e.g.</em>, firms with larger increases in tradable shares, smaller workforce, and in industries peripheral to national strategy). The evidence suggests that banks proactively prefer SOEs for the perceived safety of loans under implicit government guarantee; when this privilege disappeared after the reform, banks reacted by allocating credits more fairly. This paper provides new evidence on the bright side of share structure reforms in mitigating credit misallocation and enlightens policy makers to practical resolutions to the financing inefficiency in emerging capital markets.</p>

Bank ownership, privatization, and performance: Evidence from a transition country

The Effects of Bank Privatization on Performance and Prudential Behavior in China: Does State Ownership Matter?

Bank Ownership Reforms and Prudential Behavior: Evidence from a Transition Country

Corporate Governance and Bank Performance in China

The Effect of Ownership on the Prudential Behavior of Banks - the Case of China

Does privatization reform alleviate ownership discrimination? Evidence from the Split-share structure reform in China

Banking Reform and Efficiency in China: 1995-2008

The Performance Impact of Firm Ownership Transformation in China

The Effects of Ownership on Banks' Performance in China

How Does Government Ownership Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from China’s Privatization Experience

Does State Ownership Really Matter in Determining Access to Bank Loans? Evidence from China's Partial Privatization

Ownership Reform, Foreign Competition, and Efficiency of Chinese Commercial Banks

Determinants of state equity ownership, and its effect on value/performance: China's privatized firms

Market-oriented Transition, Risk Preference and the Profitability of China's Commercial Banks

State Ownership, Foreign Minority Shareholders, and the Efficiency of Chinese Commercial Banks

Ultimate Privatization and Change in Firm Performance: Evidence from China

Bank Discrimination, Holding Bank Ownership, and Economic Consequences: Evidence from China

Control Transfers, Privatization, and Corporate Performance: Efficiency Gains in China's Listed Companies

Privatization of State-Owned Banks,Efficiency and Financial Stability

The Difference of Portfolio Allocation between State-owned Banks and Joint-equity Banks in China

Have China's Enterprise Reforms Led to Improved Efficiency and Profitability?