Abstract:The inefficiency observed in investment within state-owned enterprises presents a significant practical challenge that can affect the sustainable development of China's economy. To address this issue, this study comprehensively explores the intricate mechanisms underlying the governance implications of mixed ownership on the investment efficiency of listed companies. Drawing on unbalanced panel data encompassing Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange A-share listed companies in China spanning the period from 2008 to 2022, this study employs a fixed-effects model to unveil the nuanced ways in which mixed ownership influences investment efficiency through the lens of agency costs. This study transcends the boundaries of traditional agency conflicts between managers and shareholders. It delves deeper, illuminating the diverse effects of agency conflicts between significant controlling shareholders and minority shareholders. The results revealed a noteworthy positive correlation between mixed ownership and investment efficiency, and verified the intermediary role of agency costs between mixed ownership and investment efficiency, which is an important result of our research. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the relationship between the two can be affected by external events, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, investment efficiency is not the most concerned issue for enterprises. The findings have practical implications for practitioners and policymakers, as they offer avenues for optimizing investment strategies and fostering efficient and effective corporate governance practices.

The Difference of Portfolio Allocation between State-owned Banks and Joint-equity Banks in China

The Effect of Ownership on the Prudential Behavior of Banks - the Case of China

The Effects of Ownership on Banks' Performance in China

Impact of Government Ownership on Investment Banks’ Underwriting Performance: Evidence from China*

Does State Ownership Really Matter in Determining Access to Bank Loans? Evidence from China's Partial Privatization

Bank Discrimination, Holding Bank Ownership, and Economic Consequences: Evidence from China

State Ownership, Cross-Border Acquisition, and Risk-Taking: Evidence from China's Banking Industry

Does privatization reform alleviate ownership discrimination? Evidence from the Split-share structure reform in China

The Effects Of Ownership Structure And Listed Status On Bank Risk In China

State ownership and credit rationing: Evidence From China

Ownership, Underwriting Quality, and the IPO Market Share of Investment Banks: Evidence from China

Comparing the performance of Chinese banks: A principal component approach

Private capital holding, financial awareness of government and steadying operation of banks: Evidence from China

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Ownership, Institutions, and Capital Structure: Evidence from China

Study on Differences of Operating-Asset Allocation of China’s State-Owned and Private Enterprises

Research on Bank Ownership of Firms：Regulation, Development and Literature

How mixed ownership affects investment efficiency? evidence from state-owned enterprises in China

How Does Government Ownership Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from China’s Privatization Experience

Commercial Bank Ownership Structure and Risk Preference

Government control structure and allocation of credit: evidence from government-owned companies in China