Abstract:Screening of urine samples is the third most frequently performed test in clinical laboratories [1]. Urinalysis generally includes two kinds of methods: strip tests and microscopic examinations [1]. Urine microscopy, urine sediment analysis using microscope, has been used to detect various urologic diseases affecting from kidney to urinary tract [1, 2]. However, manual microscopic examination is time consuming and needs experts for interpretation [3]. The effort of examining the particles in samples has long been a big issue in the hematologic field [2]. Wallace Coulter developed a counting method for particles in electrolyte solutions [2]. It made accurate cell counts in blood and became main equipment in laboratory hematologic analysis [2]. However, Coulter method could not be easily adapted in urinalysis until the late 1990s, because urine contains the broad spectrum of particles such as crystals, and cells that do not exist in blood [2]. Fifty years after Coulter method was introduced, laboratory instrument for identifying and enumeration urine particle was finally developed [2]. In the field of automated microscopy, the process of continuous technical development and adaptation has been achieved [3]. Consequently, flow cytometry and digitized microscopy have been introduced and established for enumerating urine particles in modern laboratories. Urinary tract infection (UIT) is the most common infections in both hospitalized and community-acquired patients [4]. Many investigators have evaluated the ability of flow cytometry to detect bacteria and WBCs in urine samples [3]. Because of the high percentage of negative urine culture results, efficient screening method with a high negative predictive value (NPV) has been required for a long time [5]. Researchers have extensively investigated to show whether laser-based flow cytometry can be useful screening tests for pyuria or bacteriuria [2]. Rosa et al. [4] reported that the new Sysmex urine analyzer, UF-5000 (Sysmex cooperation, Kobe, Japan) based on laser flow cytometry, presented high NPV up to 99.7% with conventional urine culture. If flow cytometric methods reduce the number of unnecessary urine culture tests, it can also save labor, time, and cost in laboratories [3]. On the other hand, the software image analysis of the digital microscope forms another one of the two main axes of automated urine sediment examinations. Because flow cytometric methods make a scattergram not an image, laboratorian cannot discard manual microscope to verify and differentiate problematic particles in urine [2]. In contrast, automated digital microscopy based on pattern recognition produces real images that can be reviewed by experts [2, 3]. Compared with manual microscopy, it shows good performance and agreement to detect RBCs, WBCs, bacteria and squamous epithelial cells [2]. However, it is less reliable in detecting non-squamous epithelial cells, non-hyaline casts, unusual crystals and lipids [6, 7]. In this issue of Ann Lab Med, Oyaert and Delanghe [3] introduced detailed reviews on recent advances in automated urinalysis systems, including application of these two practical developments. Although their performance requires further evaluation, adaptation and integration of these new technologies in urinalysis can lead to make more accurate patients results and 1 / 1 CROSSMARK_logo_3_Test

Clinical Laboratory Urine Analysis: Comparison of the UriSed Automated Microscopic Analyzer and the Manual Microscopy

Clinical Application of UF-1000i in Combination with AX-4280 for the Screening Test Ability of Urinary Formed Elements.

Development and Clinical Application of Microscopy Review Criteria of Automated Urine Chemistry and Sedimental Analysis

Clinical Application of A Fully-automatic Urine Sediment Analyzer

Comparison on three methods in the examination of urine sediment

Comparison of Labsan Tricell-1000 and Dirui FUS-2000 automated urine analyzers with manual microscopy

Compared UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer with microscopy results of urine sediment in the cast

Combination of Urine flow cytometer Sysmex UF-100,test-strip and sediment microscopy in urine erythrocyte,leukocyte and casts analysis

Performance of the Sysmex UF-1000i Urine Analyser in the Rapid Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections in Hospitalized Patients.

Advances in Automated Urinalysis Systems, Flow Cytometry and Digitized Microscopy

Comparison on the results of two urinary sediment automatic analyzers

Urine WBC and RBC Analysis by Dry Chemistry and Sediment Microscope Inspection

Improving the Detection of Urine Sediment with a Modified Urinalysis Review Procedure.

Establishment of the intelligent verification criteria for a routine urinalysis analyzer in a multi-center study.

Assessing Concordance of Results: A Comparative Study of the Manual and Automated Urinalysis Methods

Comparative Study on Three Testing Methods for Urine Formed Elements

A novel approach to screening and managing the urinary tract infections suspected sample in the general human population

Diagnostic value of microscopic examination of urine sediment

Evaluation of Sysmex UF-500i Automated Urinary Sediment Analyzer in Screening Urinary Tract Infection

The value of urine sediment analyzer in screening white blood cells and bacteria for urinary tractinfection

Cutoff values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine sediment analyzer FUS200 in culture-positive urinary-tract infections