Abstract:Apology is one of the forms of tortuous liabilities when a right of personality is infringed under Chinese law. Regarding whether this is a constitutional or reasonable rule in law, a heated argument is going on among Chinese scholars. This paper argues that, apology helps to redress a victim's emotional and psychological wounds, therefore serves the function to repair harm just as other forms of tortuous liabilities. If the defendant fails to make an appropriate apology voluntarily before the end of court debate, the court should order the defendant to apologize in the judgment. Although an apology under a judgment may be insincere, it is still valuable for many victims. Moreover, based on the theory of cognitive dissonance, the judgment may induce the defendant to adjust his attitude and lead to a sincere apology. The most difficult part of this question is the compulsory enforcement of apology. This paper examines the possible measures of enforcement provided in the civil procedure law. Indirect enforcement measures, mainly fine or imprisonment, are unconstitutional in light of the principle of proportionality for violation of the freedom of expression, freedom of religion and human dignity protected by Chinese constitution. Publication of the content of judgment is not an appropriate form of substitutional enforcement because it cannot reach a similar effect as apology. Another suggestion, that the plaintiff or the court drafts a letter of apology on behalf of the defendant and publishes it when the defendant refuses to do so, also flaws. This paper proposes a special form of subsitutional enforcement that the victim should be allowed to publish a declaration of reprimand and the defendant should be ordered to pay the cost, because a reprimand by the victim could redress his emotional and psychological wounds as well as a personal apology of the defendant. If the victim doesn't want to do so, a sum of money, the amount of which is determined in the judgment, should be paid by the defendant.

Are Costly Apologies Universally Perceived As Being Sincere?

Rejecting an intergroup apology attenuates perceived differences between victim and perpetrator groups in morality and power

Money, Moral Transgressions, and Blame

Pragmatic Studies on Apologies and the Improvement of " Meier's Repair Work"

Apologies in Emails: Interactions Between Chinese EFL Learners and Their Foreign Peers

Repairing damaged professional relationships with leader apologies: An examination of trust and forgiveness

Cultural Variations in Reasons for Advice Seeking

Culturally Divergent Consequences of Receiving Thanks in Close Relationships.

What Makes An Apology More Effective? Exploring Anthropomorphism, Individual Differences, And Emotion In Human-Automation Trust Repair

Roles of expressed gratitude and apologies in predicting reciprocal responsiveness

The Liability of Apology in Civil Law and its Compulsory Enforcement

Overcoming listener skepticism: Costly signaling in communication increases perceived honesty

The Effect of Anticipatory Apology and Appreciation in Online Support-Seeking Messages on Support Provision in the US and Korea

Use of Apology Strategies in Emails by Chinese Learners of English: Evidence Based on Naturally Occurring Data

Leader Apology in the Employee–Organization Relationship: The Roles of Subordinate Power Distance Belief and Leader Competence

Fostering Social Cohesion in Post‐Conflict Societies: The Power of Normative Apologies in Reducing Competitive Victimhood and Enhancing Reconciliation and Intergroup Negotiation

Costly punishment sustains indirect reciprocity under low defection detectability

Within‐group apologies can restore a sense of justice more for non‐victimized observers than for victims

Can an apology change after-crisis user attitude? The role of social media in online crisis management

Forgiveness in the United States and China.

The surprising costs of silence: Asymmetric preferences for prosocial lies of commission and omission.