Comparison between laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for T1b renal tumors
Wei CHEN,Yonghui CHEN,Jin ZHANG,Chen JIANG,Xiaorong WU,Jiwei HUANG,Jianjun SHA,Dongming LIU,Wei Xue,Yiran HUANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2017.05.004
2017-01-01
Journal of Clinical Urology
Abstract:Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety between open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for T1b renal tumor.Method:From January 2009 to February 2014,215 patients (127 men and 88 women) with T1b renal tumors who received OPN and LPN were retrospectively analyzed.The mean age was 56.4 (range,21-77) years old.All patients were divided into two groups:OPN group with 60 cases and LPN group with 155 cases.The difference of operation time,warm ischemia time,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of complications between the two groups were compared and analyzed.Result:The operation time,blood loss,postoperative hospital stay of OPN and LPN group were (117.3±29.2) min and (114.2±21.7) min,(238± 164.7) ml and (152± 123.8) ml,(8.6±1.1) d and (6.0±0.9) d respectively.There was statistical significance between the two groups in blood loss and hospital stay.The warm ischemia time and incidence rate of postoperative complication of the two groups were (20.1±5.8) min and (23.6±9.3) min,5.0% (3/60) and 5.2% (8/155) respectively,which was not statistical significant.Over a mean follow-up period of 52.2 (range,28-89) months,there were three and four cases of local tumor recurrence in OPN group and LPN group respectively,and two cases of lung metastasis in both groups.Conclusion:LPN is a feasible and effective option for selected T1b renal tumors.The long-term effect of the procedure needs further investigation.