Calling for Humanistic Scholarship in China
Anne S. Tsui,Liangding Jia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/more.12013
IF: 3.776
2013-01-01
Management and Organization Review
Abstract:Scholarship refers to the formal and serious study of subjects such as medicine,physics, biology, history, philosophy, and business. Good scholarship demandsthat researchers apply rigorous scientific methods to find valid knowledge thatcan improve life, both human and nonhuman. Hence, scholarship and scienceshare the common ideal of contributing to the development of a better society anda better world. Albert Einstein said, ‘Concern for making life better for ordinaryhumans must be the chief objective of science’ (Einstein qtd. in Isaacson, 2008:374). Similarly, Oscar Handlin, one of the greatest contemporary historians,argued ‘Scholarship has to prove its worth not on its own terms, but by its serviceto the nation and to the world’ (Handlin qtd. in Boyer, 1996: 17). Clearly, schol-arship, science, and the idea of ‘humanism’ are connected. In this editorial, wediscuss the importance of humanistic scholarship – scholarship for the purpose ofimprovinghumanwelfarebyfocusingonthesocialoutcomesoforganizations–forbusiness research and particularly for Chinese management research.We begin by analyzing the current status of humanistic studies in generalmanagement research and then provide data on humanism-oriented research inChinese management over the past thirty years. Results show a dramatic domi-nance of economic focus relative to human welfare focus, especially in the studiespublished in the Chinese journals. We conclude with a call for more researchon humanism-related topics to counterbalance the dominant economic focus.