Abstract:This thesis analyzes the long—discussed issue of "difficulty in filing a lawsuit" in the area of civil procedure. This issue does not refer to the situation that the court cannot accept and hear a case due to its inconformity with relevant laws. It mainly refers to the situation that the court, considering some external factors, refuses to accept some cases which conform to the required conditions stipulated in laws, regulations and judicial interpretations. This thesis points out that one main reason of this issue is the judicial policy of our country which overcomes law. The judicial policy represents itself in civil jurisdiction as restriction and negativity. It means that judicial policy always restricts the acceptance of cases which are in line with the suing conditions. The court will restrict the acceptance of some cases, such as cases of illegal fund raising, infringement due to false information disclosed by listed company, bankruptcy disputes, tainted milk tort disputes, indemnification due to natural disaster such as earthquake, as well as cases that involve sensitive social, political and economic issues. The reasons for the restriction include the specialty of rule of law in our real Society, the limited judicial system and judicial capacity under the specified power structure, the limited regulating scope and function of existing law, and pragmatism, relativism and particularism in consciousness and methodology. In the reality of China, such adjustment by judicial policy is relative ly reasonable, for some controversies which concern legal disputes actually involve political and other social factors, which cannot be independently handled and solved by judicial departments. In our country, the influence of adjustment and regulation by law is very limited, and numerous social relations are regulated by administrative and policy—based rules. The status of judicial departments decides that they lack the capability of judging independently. However, the adjustment by judicial policy which overcomes law also bears high cost. It will obviously jeopardize the authority of law, and even sacrifice public's faith and dependence on rule of law. The author believes that in the background of social transformation including the transformation of rule of law, the judicial policy restriction on filing a lawsuit would be limited gradually and finally terminated.

Some Thoughts on Standard of Legality of Administrative Remedy's Lawful Right and Interest

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Right to Be Informed and Legal Safeguard thereof

Analysis on Deficiency of Administrative Law Protection of Dwelling Right in China

A Study on the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System

International Human Rights Criteria and the Direction of Personal Rights Protection in China's Criminal Law

On Methods of Bearing Tort Liability

Critical Thinking on Article 8 of the Administrative Licence Law

The Deficiency and Countermeasures of Private Legal Relief for the Ecological Damages to Natural Resources in China

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

A Positive Analysis of the Criterion of State Compensatory Liability

The Present Situation and Problem in Chinese Criminal Protection of the Right of Personality

An Exploration of Law Predicament of Environmental Right and the Solutions

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Analysis on Combination of Pure Economic Loss and Basic Rights under the Tort Law

Difficulty in Filing a Lawsuit: Thinking on a "Chinese Issue"

On Enlargement of the Scope of Accepting Cases in Administrative Actions

Claim of Right in Rem and the Application of Action Limitation

Citizens' Disregard of Illegal Administrative Acts

Theory of Legal Interest Violation and the Determination of Crimes