The Clinical Anatomical Research on the Femoral Attachment of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and the Femoral Tunnel Position in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Liu Ping,Ao Yingfang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6710.2008.03.001
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the normal shape,size,and location of the attachments of posterior cruciate ligament(PCL) to the femur in order to accurately position the femoral tunnel in double-bundle PCL reconstruction.Methods Thirty cadaveric knees were used as specimens in this study.PCLs were separated into anterolateral bundle(ALB) and posteromedial bundle(PMB) according to the PCL tension pattern during knee flexion-extension,and the "functional bundle" in each of the bundle were determined.The size,shape,position,and center of the attachments of PCL bundles expressed as clock position and referenced to both the cartilage edge and the intercondylar femoral roof were observed.The relationship between the attachments of the ALB and PMB and the relationship between the attachments of the "functional bundles" of ALB and PMB were evaluated.Results There existed "functional bundles" consistently in both ALB and PMB,the co-operation of the "functional bundles" provided the resistance against the tibial posterior draw across most of the arc of knee flexion.The ALB attached to both the roof of the femoral intercondylar notch and the transition between the roof and the medial side of the notch and the femoral attachment of ALB looked as rectangle in shape,and its mean area was 82.77±20.90mm2,attachment of the "functional bundle" of the ALB to the femur was in the medial side of the ALB,and was trapezoid or triangular in shape,its area was 32.16±18.96mm2;The PMB attached to the medial side of the femoral intercondylar notch and was oval in shape,its mean area was 122.13±38.05mm2.The "functional bundle" of PBM was located in the posterior portion of PBM,and was trapezoid in shape.The mean area of the "functional bundle" of PBM was 36.89±5.21mm2.No "functional bundle" attached to the centre of the attachment of either ALB or PMB.The mean distance between the attachments of the "functional bundles" of ALB and PMB was 11.27±1.16mm.The mean angle between the proximal edge of the PCL footprint and the femoral shaft was 88.71°±9.36°.Conclusion There were existence of "functional bundles" in both ALB and PMB.The optimum position for the femoral tunnel in double-bundle PCL reconstruction should be located in the attachment sites of the "functional bundles" of ALB and PMB.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?