Abstract:Objective:To determine the biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.Methods:After nonlinear finite element models of the intact upper cervical spine (C0-3) were constructed and validated, they were processed into 3 kinds with normal axis anatomy, a high-riding vertebral artery and a thin axis lamina, re-spectively.In the models, the odontoid fracture stabilized by atlantoaxial fixation and the atlas fracture sta-bilized by occipitocervical fixation were simulated.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+bilateral atlas lateral mass screws (pedicle screw group); in the occipitocervical fixation, the group of unilateral spinous process screw+contralateral pedicle screw+occipital screws (spinous process screw group) was compared with that of bilateral axis pedicle screws+occipital screws (pedicle screw group).Three different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws (horizontal, oblique and vertical) were applied.The range of motion (ROM) was measured in extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of occipitocervical bodies (C0-C3) after internal fixation.Results:Compared with the intact models, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were obviously reduced in the spinous process screw group and the pedicle screw group in the models with atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the ROMs of extension-flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of C1-C2 were greater in the spinous process screw group than in the pedicle screw group; in the occipitocervical fixation, the spinous process screw group had greater ROM of lateral flexion of C1-C2 and greater ROM of rotation of C0-C2 than the pedicle screw group.There were unobvious differences in insertion of spinous process screws between the horizontal, oblique and vertical techniques.Conclusions:In the atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations, the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw can provide as fine stability as the bilateral axis pedicle screws.In the atlantoaxial fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw.In the occipitocervical fixation, the bilateral axis pedicle screws may lead to better stability of C1-C2 in lateral flexion and rotation than the unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw. The 3 different techniques in insertion of spinous process screws lead to an unobvious difference in the stability of C1-C2.

The Biomechanical Study on Four Internal Fixation Techniques for Occipitocervical Spine

[Clinical Effect of Posterior Atlanto Axial Vertebra Internal Fixation for Treatment of Instability of Occipitocervical].

Biomechanical and Clinical Study of Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation for Treatment of Traumatic Instability of C1-C2 Joint

Biomechanical stability of atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fixations with unilateral spinous process screw plus contralateral pedicle screw: a finite element analysis

Progression of Research of Posterior Screw Fixation on Atlas

The biomechanical study of craniovertebral junction fixation with posterior transarticular screw]

The biomechanical stability of cable dragged reduction and cantilever beam internal fixation by posterior atlantoaxial approach

Biomechanical Comparative Study of Single-Level Anterior Intervertebral Decompression and Fusion with Three Kinds of Plates

Biomechanical analysis of direct posterior C1 screws compression reduction in the selective treatment of unstable atlas fractures

Biomechanical stability of posterior atlas lateral mass screw combined axis lamina hook for internal ifxation

Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Technique with C_2 Crossing Laminar Screws in Posterior Atlantoaxial Fixation

Biomechanical Study of C1 Posterior Arch Crossing Screw and C2 Lamina Screw Fixations for Atlantoaxial Joint Instability

Treatment of Atlantoaxial Instability with C1-C2 Posterior Transarticular Screw Fixation

Biomechanical Study of Short Segment Pedicle Screw and Hook Combined with Spinal Internal Fixation

Biomechanical evaluation of C1 lateral mass and C2 translaminar bicortical screws in atlantoaxial fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric study

Biomechanical characteristics of posterior fixation for repairing atlantoaxial instability

Biomechanical comparison between C1 lateral mass C2 crossing laminar screws fixation and C1-2 transarticular screw fixation

Biomechanical Role of the C1 Lateral Mass Screws in Occipitoatlantoaxial Fixation: A Finite Element Analysis.

Effect of Different Fixation Methods on Biomechanical Property of Cervical Vertebral Body Replacement and Fusion

Strain electronic measurements on craniovertebral junction fixation with posterior screw technique

Biomechanical Analysis of Transpedicular Screw Fixation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine