Biomechanical comparison between C1 lateral mass C2 crossing laminar screws fixation and C1-2 transarticular screw fixation

黄师,侯铁胜,赵鑫,贺石生
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-9030.2008.12.039
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare biomechanical stability between C1, lateral mass C2 crossing laminar screws fixation and C1-2 transarticular screw fixation. Methods Ten fresh adult cervical specimens (CO-C4) were obtained,of which 5 were male and four were female, and mean age was 58 years (50-72 years). All specimens were made up into four different testing models such as C1-2 intact ( M0 ) ,C1-2 insta-bility ( M1 ) ,C1 lateral mass and C2 crossing laminar screws fixation ( M2 ) and C1-2 transarticular screw fixation ( M3 ), and then three-dimension biomechanical testing was performed. The range of motion ( ROM )and natural zone (NZ) were recorded under flexion and extension,axial rotation and lateral bending motion. Results The ROM and NZ of M0,M1 ,M2 and M3 were ((20.4±9.2)°、(10.4±5.8)°;; (46.3±17.2))°,(34.5±14.1)°;(4.1±0.9)°,(1.9±0.8)°;(4.3±1.0)°,(2.1±0.7)°. respectively under flexion and extension. The ROM and NZ of M0, M1, M2 and M3 were (65.3±12.9)°、(40.8±11.2)°;(91.7±10.5)°,(72.3±12.6)°;(8.9±2.1)°,(4.7±1.8)°;(8.4±2.5)°,(4.4±2.3)°;respectively under axial rotation. The ROM and NZ of M0, M1, M2 and M3 were (11.5±4.3)°、(7.2±3.2)°;(35.0±12.9)°,(21.9±11.8)°;(2.9±1.1)°,(1.4±0.8)°;(2.5±1.4)°,(1.3±1.0)°;respectively under lateral bending. The stability of M2 and M3 was superior to M0and M1, under three-dimensional biomechanical testing. However,the difference in stability between M2 and M3 had no significance (P > 0.05 ). Conclusion C2 crossing laminar screws fixation has good biomechanical stability and is an alternative fixation of C2 pedicle screws.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?