Abstract:Background: Implantation of nonabsorbable polypropylene (PP) mesh in the vagina is the main surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP); however, clinical outcomes remain controversial and far from satisfactory. In particular, reducing the exposure or erosion of vaginal implants to obtain improved functional reconstruction is challenging. There is an urgent need for the development of new materials and/or products for POP treatment. A nanofibrous biomimetic mesh was recently developed to address this issue. Objective: In this study, the basic properties of the newly developed mesh, including structural characteristics, mechanical properties, biological response of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in vitro, and tissue regeneration and biocompatibility in vivo, were evaluated and compared with those of Gynemesh (TM) PS.Methods: Scanning electron microscopy and uniaxial tensile methods were used to evaluate microstructure and mechanical properties, respectively. Mesenchymal stem cell growth on the meshes was observed by fluorescence microscopy to visualize the expression of enhanced red fluorescent protein. Twenty-four mature female Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 (nanofibrous biomimetic mesh, Medprin, Germany, n=12) and group 2 (Gynemesh (TM) PS, Ethicon, USA; n=12). The posterior vaginal wall was incised from the introitus, and the mesh was then implanted. Three implants of each type were tested for 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Connective tissue organization, inflammation, vascularization, and regenerated tissue were histologically assessed.Results: The nanofibrous biomimetic mesh is a relatively heavy material and exhibited lower porosity than Gynemesh (TM) PS. The new mesh was stiffer than Gynemesh (TM) PS (p < 0.001) but supported human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell attachment. Erosion of the grafts did not occur in any animal. The nanofibrous biomimetic mesh was encapsulated by a thicker layer of connective tissue and was associated with significantly greater inflammatory scores compared with Gynemesh (TM) PS. At 12 weeks, the vascularization of the new mesh was greater than that of Gynemesh (TM) PS (p < 0.05). No significant difference in the thickness of the smooth muscle layer following implantation was observed between the two groups (p > 0.05).Conclusions: The nanofibrous biomimetic mesh is a candidate for reinforcing pelvic reconstruction. The mesh could be improved by decreasing its weight and stiffness and increasing its porosity. This mesh could serve as a carrier for stem cells in future regenerative medicine and tissue engineering research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The Medium Term Effect of Polypropylene Mesh on Severe Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Females

Clinical Analysis of Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Opreation in 31 Cases With SUI and POP

Comparison of Prolift System and Gynemesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery

The application of mesh in female pelvic reconstruction surgery

Application of Acellular Dermal Mesh in Female Pelvic Reconstruction Surgery

Study on Mesh-Augmented Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery in Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Effect of Pelvic Reconstruction Surgery with Synthetic Mesh on Improving the Short Term Quality of Life in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Long-term treatment outcomes of transvaginal mesh surgery versus anterior-posterior colporrhaphy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Long‐term Treatment Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Anterior–posterior Colporrhaphy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa Mesh for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapsed.

Nanofibrous Biomimetic Mesh Can Be Used for Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Study.

The Clinical Efficacy Of Biologic Mesh And Synthetic Mesh For Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery

Comparison of two female pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries

Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Uterine Suspension to Anterior Abdominal Wall Bilaterally Using Synthetic Mesh to Treat Uterovaginal Prolapse

Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Life Post-Synthetic Mesh-Augmented Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in the Chinese Population.

Transvaginal Single-Port Laparoscopic Pelvic Reconstruction with Y-shaped Mesh: Experiences of 93 Cases

[Analysis of Mesh Related Complications after Trans-Vaginal Mesh-Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery].

[Prospective Multi-Center Study in "xiehe" Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse].

Tissue engineering in female pelvic floor reconstruction

[Laparoscopic Y-shaped Polypropylene Mesh for Uterine and Vaginal Vault Prolapse].

[Treatment and Outcome of Polypropylene Mesh or Tape Related Pain after Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery].