Comparison of two female pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries

XUE Xiu-ping,FAN Li-lin,LEI Gang,HAN Ke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2011.21.008

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy of prolift mesh placement with traditional.hysterectomy for pelvic floor reconstruction.Methods Fifty patients with pelvic floor dysfunction were selected in Huaian Maternal and Child health Care Hospital from January 2009 to December 2010.Prolift mesh placement and transvaginal hysterectomy and colporrhaphia anterior-posterior were performed in 20 and 30 patients respectively.The efficacy of the two pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries was evaluated.Results The patients were followed up for 6 to 24 months after surgery.No severe complication was found in all patients.After floor reconstructive surgery with prolift mesh,one patient had perineal and lower abdominal symptoms,.two had urinary incontinence,and one had constipation.No infection and erosion occurred.POP-Q index achieved 100.The recovery rate was 100%.After traditional pelvic floor reconstructive surgery,five patients had perineal and lower abdominal symptoms,four had urinary incontinence,and one had constipation.POP-Q index was decreased.The recovery rate was 76.7%.Conclusion The pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with prolift mesh was safe,convenient and can bring good short-term medical effects.