Comparison of Prolift System and Gynemesh in Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery

张晓红,王红,赵丽君,王建六

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1861.2009.01.002

2009-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the of Prolift system and Gynemesh in total pelvic floor reconstruction and to explore suitable mesh for total pelvic floor reconstruction. Methods Thirty-one women underwent the surgery for combined defect of pelvic floor who were admitted to our department from December 2006 to April 2008. The patients were divided into two groups:14 cases in Gynecare Prolift System surgery and the other 17 in the group of revised total pelvic floor construction with Gynemesh. We compared the pre-,peri-operative data and follow-up results of the two groups were compared,respectively. Results No significant difference was found in the body mass index,menopause age and pregnant times between the two groups (P0.05). The prolapse of anterior vaginal wall of the Prolift group was severe than Gynemesh group (P0.05). The operative hemorrhage,the highest body temperature,the residue urine and the time of in-hospital of the two group had no significant difference (P0.05).The operation time of Prolift group was shorter (P0.05) than that of Gynemesh group. The follow-up rate of the Prolift group was 100%,with mean time of (8.8±3.0) m. Only one case (7.1%) recurred with anterior vaginal prolapse in 6 months after operation. One case (7.1%) occurred erosion in posterior vaginal wall. The follow-up rate of the Gyenmesh group was 94%,with mean time of (12.4±3.0) m. Four cases (23.5%) were recurrence and 3 (17.6%) were found erosion in vaginal wall. Conclusion The Prolift system and Gynemesh are both safety and feasible. According to the short term clinical outcomes,the Prolift system is little bit better than the Gyenmesh,yet the long term outcomes need further study.