[Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution of Two-Piece Post Crown with Different Adhesives ].
Lihui He,Lijie Liu,Bei Gao,Shang Gao,Yifu Chen,Liu Zhihui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2013.04.005
2013-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To establish three-dimensional finite element model of two-piece post crown to the mandibular first molar residual roots, and analyze the stress distribution characteristic to the residual roots with different adhesives, so as to get the best combination under different conditions.METHODS:The complete mandibular first molar in vitro was selected, the crown was removed along the cemento-enamel junction, then the residual roots were scanned by CT. CT images were imported into a reverse engineering software, and the three-dimensional finite element model of the mandibular first molar residual roots was reconstructed. Titanium two-piece post crown of the mandibular first molar residual roots was produced, then was scanned by CT. The model was reconstructed and assembled by MIMICS. The stress distribution of the root canal and root section under the vertical load and lateral load with different bonding systems were analyzed.RESULTS:Three-dimensional finite element model of two-piece post crown to the mandibular first molar residual roots was established. With the increasing of elastic modulus of the adhesives, the maximum stress within the root canal was also increasing. Elastic modulus of zinc phosphate was the biggest, so the stress within the root canal was the biggest; elastic modulus of Superbond C&B was the smallest, so the stress within the root canal was the smallest. Lateral loading stress was much larger than the vertical load. Under vertical load, the load on the root section was even with different bonding systems. Under lateral load, the maximum stress was much larger than the vertical load. The stress on the root section was minimum using zinc phosphate binder, and the stress on the root section was maximum using Superbond C&B.CONCLUSION:In two-piece post crown restorations, there is significant difference between different adhesives on tooth protection. When the tooth structure of the root canal orifices is weak, in order to avoid the occurrence of splitting, the larger elastic modulus bonding system is the first choice, such as zinc phosphate binder. When the resistance form of the root canal orifices is good enough but the root is too weak, it is suggested that the smaller elastic modulus bonding system is the first choice, such as Superbond C&B.