Effects of synthetic route on structure and electrochemical performance of Li3V2(PO4)3/C cathode materials
Y.Q. Qiao,J.P. Tu,J.Y. Xiang,X.L. Wang,Y.J. Mai,D. Zhang,W.L. Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.109
IF: 6.6
2011-01-01
Electrochimica Acta
Abstract:Three different synthetic routes, including solid-state reaction, sol–gel and hydrothermal methods are successfully used for preparation of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C. Ascorbic acid is used as a reducing agent and/or as a chelating agent. The Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C synthesized by hydrothermal method with fine particles exhibits lower impedance and smaller potential difference values between oxidation and reduction peaks than those by solid-state reaction and sol–gel methods. Thus as cathode material for Li-ion batteries, the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C synthesized by hydrothermal method shows higher discharge capacity, better rate capability and cyclic performance. Even at a high charge–discharge rate of 10 C, it still can deliver a discharge capacity of 101.4 mAh g −1 and 106.6 mAh g −1 in the potential range of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V, respectively. The hydrothermal synthesis has been considered to be a competitive process to prepare Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C cathode materials with excellent electrochemical performances. Keywords Lithium vanadium phosphate Synthetic route Electrochemical performance Lithium-ion battery 1 Introduction Recently, Li-ion batteries (LIBs) have been considered as great potential power sources in electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) due to their high energy densities [1–3] . Monoclinic Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 is an attractive cathode material for the lithium batteries because it has good ion mobility, high operate voltage, high theoretical capacity (197 mAh g −1 ) and good thermal stability [4,5] . Up to now, various synthetic routes have been employed to the preparation of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 such as solid-state reaction [6–19] , low temperature solid-state route [20,21] , sol–gel method [22–29] , wet coordination method [30,31] , microwave solid-state synthesis [32–34] , hydrothermal synthesis [35,36] , chemical reduction and lithiation method [37] , rheological phase reaction synthesis [38] , spray-drying [39,40] , liquid-phase sphericizing granulation [41] and other synthetic routes [42,43] . These methods are used to the synthesis of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 always under different preparation conditions, so that the final products are different in many ways such as microstructure, particle size distribution, crystallinity and phase purity, which have a significant influence on the electrochemical performance. Hence, to choose a simple and convenient method is important to the preparation of cathode materials with high performance for LIBs. Conventionally, solid-state reaction method is often used to the fabrication of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 , the process using either hydrogen or carbon as the reducing agent when sintering at high temperatures. During the carbothermal reduction (CTR) reaction, carbon can provide a favorable reduction environment for V 5+ and a function for suppressing the particle growth. Meanwhile, the carbon coating on the surface of particles improves the conductivity significantly. However, the CTR method usually needs high sintering temperature and long heating time, which may result in a large particle size and aggregation of the material. Compared with solid-state reaction, sol–gel method provides gel precursors where starting ingredients are homogeneously mixed at atomic level, thus smaller particle size for the resultant powders can be obtained [25,26] . Nevertheless, the sol–gel procedure always involves complicated pretreatment processes. Hydrothermal synthesis is considered to be a viable approach to prepare fine particles [44] . However, there have been few reports on the preparation of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 by using hydrothermal synthesis in the open literatures [35,36] . In this present work, we examined the effects of synthetic route on the structure and electrochemical performance of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C by using ascorbic acid as a reducing agent and/or as a chelating agent. For this purpose, three Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C cathode materials were prepared by solid-state reaction, sol–gel and hydrothermal synthetic routes. 2 Experimental 2.1 Synthesis Li 2 CO 3 , NH 4 VO 3 and NH 4 H 2 PO 4 were used as raw materials. Ascorbic acid was used here as a reducing agent. For the sol–gel method, ascorbic acid was also employed as a chelating agent. An appropriate amount of ascorbic acid (15 wt.%) was added to the raw materials, and then this mixture was dispersed in ethanol and ball milled for 5 h in a planetary mill. Then, a clear bottle-green solution formed. The resulting solution was divided into three parts. For the solid-state reaction, one part of the solution was dried at 60 °C in an air oven for 24 h to get a precursor. For the sol–gel method, the other part of the solution was constantly stirred at 90 °C for 4 h, and a gel formed. The gel was then dried at 120 °C for 12 h to get a homogeneous precursor. For the hydrothermal synthesis, the last part of the solution about 80 mL was transferred into polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) container (inner volume: 110 mL). The container was sealed and maintained at 220 °C for 4 h, and then cooled to room temperature and the resulting nut-brown precursor was dried at 60 °C. Finally, all the three precursors were pressed into tablets and then sintered at 750 °C for 8 h under Ar flow in a tube furnace to obtained the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C powders. The final products obtained by solid-state reaction (SSR), sol–gel (SG) and hydrothermal synthesis (HTS) were labeled as SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C, respectively. 2.2 Materials characterization DSC-TGA analysis was measured on a SDT Q600 apparatus in the temperature ranging from 25 to 1000 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min −1 under an Ar flow of 120 mL min −1 . The morphologies and structures of the as-synthesized powders were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, FEI SIRION) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Philips PC-APD with Cu Kα radiation). The residual carbon contents of the powders were determined by means of an automatic elemental analyzer (EA, Flash EA1112). 2.3 Electrochemical performance tests Electrochemical performances of the as-synthesized materials were invesigated using CR2025 coin-type cell. A metallic lithium foil served as the anode electrode. The cathode consisted of 85 wt.% active material, 10% acetylene black and 5 wt.% polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) on aluminum foil. 1 M LiPF 6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)-dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1 in volume) as the electrolyte, and a polypropylene micro-porous film (Cellgard 2300) as the separator. The cells were assembled in a glove box filled with high-purity argon. The charge–discharge tests were conducted on LAND battery program-control test system (Wuhan, China) between 3.0 and 4.3 V, 3.0 and 4.8 V (vs. Li/Li + ) by applying from 0.1 to 10 C current densities at room temperature, respectively. For electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements, the test cells were with the metallic lithium foil as both the reference and counter electrodes. EIS measurements were performed on CHI660C electrochemical workstation over a frequency range of 100 kHz–10 mHz at a stage of charge (3.6 V) by applying an AC signal of 5 mV. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments were performed on this electrochemical workstation in the potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s −1 , respectively. 3 Results and discussion In order to determine the sintering temperature, DSC-TGA analysis was introduced to study the precursor after ground the mixture of Li 2 CO 3 , NH 4 VO 3 , NH 4 H 2 PO 4 and ascorbic acid in the stoichiometric proportion of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 for 30 min. Fig. 1 shows the DSC-TGA curves of the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C precursor mixture. The TGA curve shows three main weight-loss regions. The first one between 25 and 200 °C is attributed to the release of adsorbed water and NH 3 . The second steep weight loss, which occurs between 200 and 400 °C may be relative to the volatilization of H 2 O, CO 2 and NH 3 from the precursor. Subsequently, the weight loss between 400 and 600 °C can be ascribed to the reduction of V 5+ ions to V 3+ ions, pyrolysis of the remaining ascorbic acid and the formation of crystalline Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 . Above 600 °C, there is no obvious weight loss in the TGA curve, which indicates the formation of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 . Therefore, we choose 750 °C as the sintering temperature. Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C powders. The diffraction peaks of all the three powders are indexed to the single-phase Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (monoclinic structure with a space group of P2 1 /n, ICSD #96962), which are in good agreement with the previous reports [4,5] . The cell parameters of SSR-LVP, SG-LVP and HTS-LVP materials are listed in Table 1 , which are close to those data in previous reports [4,21] . This indicates that the different synthetic routes do not have obvious effects on the cell parameters of final products. In addition, no other impure phases or secondary phases such as LiVP 2 O 7 , Li 3 PO 4 , Li 2 O, Li 3 VO 4 , V 2 O 3 and VPO 4 are found in the XRD patterns. This suggests that the pure monoclinic Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 are obtained under the three synthetic routes. Furthermore, there is no additional diffraction peak related-carbon being observed, which can be attributed to the amount of carbon is too low to be detected, or the thickness of the carbon layer on the particles is too thin [14,23] . However, the amount of residual carbon in the SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C materials determined by automatic elemental analyzer is 1.48 wt.%, 1.02 wt.% and 1.72 wt.%, respectively. The different contents of the residual carbon in final products will affect the particle size and the electrochemical properties of the materials. Fig. 3 shows the SEM images of precursors and Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C powders. As shown in Fig. 3 a–c, the SSR-precursor is block-like with a large size, and the SG-precursor shows a gelatiniform structure, whereas the HTS-precursor obtained from the hydrothermal treatment has a relatively small particle size and uniform size distribution. It is found that the precursors are different in morphology and particle size, which may have significant influence on the characteristics of the final products after heat treatment. As shown in Fig. 3 a′, the primary particles of the SSR-LVP/C merge with each other and form large secondary porous particles with sizes of 10–25 μm in diameters. Although the porous microstructure could help the electrolyte to penetrate the positive materials and promote good electronic contact among the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 particles, the SSR-LVP/C particles were still in large size and thus had a relative lower specific area, which would damage the electrochemical performance of the product. In contrast to SSR-LVP/C particles, the SG-LVP/C particles become smaller in all, however, abnormal large particles still can be observed ( Fig. 3 b′). The HTS-LVP/C is composed of more uniform particles, and the abnormal large particles are restrained effectively by HTS, as shown in Fig. 3 c′. In particles with a smaller uniform particle size and a large specific surface area, these will be possible to extract all lithium-ions and electrons efficiently during the cycle performance of the products. In order to understand fully about the microstructure of the composite and check carbon coating on the particles, TEM analysis of HTS-LVP/C was conducted. As shown in Fig. 4 a , the HTS-LVP/C particle has several hundred nanometers in size. It is clearly seen from Fig. 4 b that the particle is coated with a uniform amorphous carbon layer, and the coating thickness is about 6.5 nm. It is believed that the presence of this carbon layer is favorable to improve the electronic conductivity and enhance the electrochemical properties of the material. The three LVP/C powders prepared by solid-state reaction, sol–gel and hydrothermal synthetic routes have different morphologies and particle sizes. Electrochemical impedance measurement is a useful method for studying the internal resistance of batteries assembled by introducing different cathode materials, and small resistance is beneficial for the extraction/reinsertion of Li + ions during the charge/discharge processes [29] . Therefore, EIS measurements were used to study the electrochemical behaviors of the as-synthesized materials. Fig. 5 presents the EIS curves over a frequency range of 100 kHz–10 mHz at a stage of charge (3.6 V) by applying an AC signal of 5 mV. Equivalent circuit is also provided as an inset in Fig. 5 . It is clear that the EIS curves of three electrodes are similar, which are composed of an intercept at high frequency, a high-middle frequency semicircle and a linear part in the low frequency. The intercept impedance is almost same (4–5 Ω) for all the electrodes, which corresponds to the solution resistance ( R e ). The semicircle corresponds to the charge transfer resistance ( R ct ) and double layer capacitance ( CPE ct ). The simulated charge transfer resistance R ct of the SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C are 110.9 Ω, 64.8 Ω and 41.2 Ω, respectively. The SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C composites exhibit the smaller R ct value, which indicates the electrons and Li + ions can transfer more quickly on the interface of electrode/electrolyte. As is well known, a small charge transfer resistance is important for a cathode material to achieve good electrochemical performance. The CV curves are shown in Fig. 6 for the SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C electrodes in the potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s −1 . As shown in Fig. 6 a, all the electrodes present three couples of oxidation and reduction peaks between 3.0 and 4.3 V (labeled as a/a′, b/b′ and c/c′), which correspond to the lithium extraction and insertion as the stoichiometric ranges: x = 0.0–0.5, 0.5–1.0 and 1.0–2.0 in Li 3− x V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 [4–6] , respectively. Between 3.0 and 4.8 V, all the three Li + ions from Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 can be completely extracted. As shown in Fig. 6 b, four oxidation peaks and three reduction peaks are observed in the curves (the first two couples are labeled as e/e′, f/f′), which are in great agreement with the previous publications [10,12,22,23,25] . As seen in Fig. 6 , for the SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C electrodes, the shapes of CV curves do not change greatly, indicating that there are no changes in redox behavior in the electrodes. However, some apparent differences among the three curves can be found. Firstly, the peak of current density of the HTS-LVP/C electrode is higher than those of the SSR-LVP/C and SG-LVP/C electrodes. Secondly, as summarized in Table 2 , the potential differences between oxidation and reduction peaks are smallest for the HTS-LVP/C electrode. It is well known that the well-defined peaks and small potential difference values between oxidation and reduction peaks are advantageous to the enhancement of electrode reaction reversibility. It is noticed that the HTS-LVP/C shows these advantaged characteristics, and therefore we expect that the electrode would exhibit excellent charge–discharge performance. Fig. 7 a and b shows the initial charge–discharge curves of the three electrodes at 0.1 C in the potential range of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V, respectively. As shown in Fig. 7 a, all the electrodes exhibit three charge flat plateaus and the corresponding three discharge ones, which are consistent with the results of the CV curves ( Fig. 6 a). The initial discharge capacities of the SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C are 127.2, 130.6 and 131.9 mAh g −1 , respectively. When the charge voltage broadened to 4.8 V, all three Li + ions could be extracted from LVP [4] . As seen in Fig. 7 b, there are four plateaus in the charge process and three declining discharge plateaus corresponding to the complicated phase transition in the reduction process. Between 3.0 and 4.8 V, the initial discharge capacities of the SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C are 163.3, 177.1 and 184.4 mAh g −1 , respectively. Compared to the SSR-LVP/C and SG-LVP/C, the HTS-LVP/C has long charge/discharge curves and low plateau voltage separations ( Fig. 7 ), which indicate that the HTS-LVP/C has low electrochemical polarization and good reversibility in the charge/discharge processes [23] . Therefore, the HTS-LVP/C shows the highest initial discharge capacities in both voltage ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V. What's more, the effects of synthetic routes are also apparent from the charge–discharge cycling performances, as shown in Fig. 8 . After 50 cycles, the SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C electrodes can sustain 96.4% (122.6 mAh g −1 ), 96.6% (126.2 mAh g −1 ) and 96.7% (127.5 mAh g −1 ) capacity of the 1st cycle at 0.1 C between 3.0 and 4.3 V. However, the effects become more apparent between 3.0 and 4.8 V, where the capacity retention at the 50th cycle for the SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C is 84.5% (149.6 mAh g −1 ) and 88.5% (163.2 mAh g −1 ), respectively, but the percentage is only 74.2% (121.2 mAh g −1 ) for the SSR-LVP/C ( Fig. 8 b). The above results thus clearly demonstrate the effects of the synthetic condition on the structure and performance of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C cathode materials. The optimal synthesizing condition seems to be approached to the HTS route, since the LVP/C shows much smaller particle size and more uniform particle size distribution by using this method, thus leading to better reversibility in the charge–discharge process and better capacity retention upon cycling. Fig. 9 shows the rate performance of the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C electrodes in the potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V (0.5–10 C charge–discharge rate). The discharge capacity of the HTS-LVP/C is the largest among three electrodes over the entire range of charge–discharge rate, which ranges from 130.8 mAh g −1 at 0.5 C to 101.4 mAh g −1 at 10 C between 3.0 and 4.3 V ( Fig. 9 a), and 156.6 mAh g −1 to 106.6 mAh g −1 between 3.0 and 4.8 V ( Fig. 9 b). However, the discharge capacity of the SSR-LVP/C electrode sharply decreases with the charge–discharge rate, especially at high rates. Furthermore, it is also clear that the HTS-LVP/C shows higher discharge capacity recovers than those of the SSR-LVP/C and SG-LVP/C by decreasing the current density to 0.5 C. Fig. 10 shows the typical charge–discharge curves of the SSR-LVP/C, SG-LVP/C and HTS-LVP/C electrodes at 10 C rate in the potential range of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V. It can be observed that the HTS-LVP/C exhibits the higher discharge capacities as well as the potential-plateaus than the other ones, which indicate the polarization of the HTS-LVP/C is indeed reduced. From the results, we conclude that the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C synthesized by HTS in this work presents enhanced electrochemical performances. This improvement can be attributed to uniform and fine particles via HTS process, which increases the specific surface area of the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C particles and thus leads to larger contact area with the conductor of carbon. 4 Conclusions The effects of the synthetic condition including solid-state reaction, sol–gel and hydrothermal synthetic routes on the structure, morphology and electrochemical performance of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C have been compared. The Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C particles synthesized by hydrothermal synthesis show more uniform and fine sizes than those synthesized by solid-state reaction and sol–gel methods. Small and uniform particles with the least agglomeration can improve the specific surface area of the Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 /C particles, which will be possible to extract all lithium-ions and electrons efficiently during cycling. Compared to SSR-LVP/C and SG-LVP/C, the HTS-LVP/C exhibited good reversibility performance during charge–discharge processes and high discharge capacities in both potential ranges of 3.0–4.3 V and 3.0–4.8 V. Therefore, hydrothermal synthesis is a preponderant method for the preparation of Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 cathode materials with high electrochemical performances when using ascorbic acid as the carbon source. References [1] B. Kang G. Ceder Nature 458 2009 190 [2] H.M. Xie R.S. Wang J.R. Ying L.Y. Zhang A.F. Jalbout H.Y. Yu G.L. Yang X.M. Pan Z.M. Su Adv. Mater. 18 2006 2609 [3] X.L. Wu L.Y. Jiang F.F. Cao Y.G. Guo L.J. Wan Adv. Mater. 21 2009 2710 [4] S.-C. Yin H. Grondey P. Strobel M. Anne L.F. Nazar J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 2003 10402 [5] H. Huang S.C. Yin T. Kerr N. Taylor L.F. Nazar Adv. Mater. 14 2002 1525 [6] J. Barker M.Y. Saidi J.L. Swoyer J. Electrochem. Soc. 150 2003 A684 [7] X.J. Zhu Y.X. Liu L.M. Geng L.B. Chen H.X. Liu M.H. Cao Solid State Ionics 179 2008 1679 [8] S.K. Zhong Z.L. Yin Z.X. Wang H.J. Guo X.H. Li Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 16 2006 s708 [9] J.Y. Xiang J.P. Tu L. Zhang X.L. Wang Y. Zhou Y.Q. Qiao Y. Lu J. Power Sources 195 2010 8331 [10] L. Zhang J.P. Tu J.Y. Xiang Y. Zhou X.L. Wang S.J. Shi J. Power Sources 195 2010 5057 [11] H. Huang T. Faulkner J. Barker M.Y. Saidi J. Power Sources 189 2009 748 [12] X.C. Zhou Y.M. Liu Y.L. Guo Electrochim. Acta 54 2009 2253 [13] J.W. Wang J. Liu G.L. Yang X.F. Zhang X.D. Yan X.M. Pan R.S. Wang Electrochim. Acta 54 2009 6451 [14] T. Jiang C.Z. Wang G. Chen H. Chen Y.J. Wei X. Li Solid State Ionics 180 2009 708 [15] Z.Y. Chen C.S. Dai G. Wu M. Nelson X.G. Hu R.X. Zhang J.S. Liu J.C. Xia Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 8595 [16] P. Fu Y.M. Zhao Y.Z. Dong X.N. An G.P. Shen J. Power Sources 162 2006 651 [17] X.H. Rui C. Li C.H. Chen Electrochim. Acta 54 2009 3374 [18] Y.Q. Qiao X.L. Wang Y. Zhou J.Y. Xiang D. Zhang S.J. Shi J.P. Tu Electrochim. Acta 56 2010 510 [19] Y.Q. Qiao X.L. Wang J.Y. Xiang D. Zhang W.L. Liu J.P. Tu Electrochim. Acta 56 2011 2269 [20] P. Fu Y.M. Zhao Y.Z. Dong X.N. An G.P. Shen Electrochim. Acta 52 2006 1003 [21] L.J. Wang X.C. Zhou Y.L. Guo J. Power Sources 195 2010 2844 [22] Y.Z. Li Z. Zhou X.P. Gao J. Yan Electrochim. Acta 52 2007 4922 [23] Y.Z. Li X. Liu J. Yan Electrochim. Acta 53 2007 474 [24] Q.Q. Chen J.M. Wang Z. Tang W.C. He H.B. Shao J.Q. Zhang Electrochim. Acta 52 2007 5251 [25] P. Fu Y.M. Zhao X.N. An Y.Z. Dong X.M. Hou Electrochim. Acta 52 2007 5281 [26] X.J. Zhu Y.X. Liu L.M. Geng L.B. Chen J. Power Sources 184 2008 578 [27] T. Jiang W.C. Pan J. Wang X.F. Bie F. Du Y.J. Wei C.Z. Wang G. Chen Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 3864 [28] X.H. Rui C. Li J. Liu T. Cheng C.H. Chen Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 6761 [29] M.M. Ren Z. Zhou X.P. Gao W.X. Peng J.P. Wei J. Phys. Chem. C 112 2008 5689 [30] L. Wang X. Li X.Q. Jiang F.S. Pan F. Wu Solid State Sci. 12 2010 1248 [31] L. Wang X.Q. Jiang X. Li X.Q. Pi Y. Ren F. Wu Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 5057 [32] G. Yang H.D. Liu H.M. Ji Z.Z. Chen X.F. Jiang J. Power Sources 195 2010 5374 [33] G. Yang H.D. Liu H.M. Ji Z.Z. Chen X.F. Jiang Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 2951 [34] G. Yang H.M. Ji H.D. Liu B. Qian X.F. Jiang Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 3669 [35] H.W. Liu C.X. Cheng X.T. Huang J.L. Li Electrochim. Acta 55 2010 8461 [36] C.X. Chang J.F. Xiang X.X. Shi X.Y. Han L.J. Yuan J.T. Sun Electrochim. Acta 54 2008 623 [37] J.C. Zheng X.H. Li Z.X. Wang H.J. Guo Q.Y. Hu W.J. Peng J. Power Sources 189 2009 476 [38] C.X. Chang J.F. Xiang X.X. Shi X.Y. Han L.J. Yuan J.T. Sun Electrochim. Acta 53 2008 2232 [39] F. Yu J.-J. Zhang Y.-F. Yang G.Z. Song J. Inorg. Mater. 24 2009 349 [40] F. Yu J.J. Zhang Y.F. Yang G.Z. Song J. Solid State Electrochem. 14 2010 883 [41] C.P. Hou M. Yue Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 23 2007 1954 [42] A.P. Tang X.Y. Wang S.Y. Yang Mater. Lett. 62 2008 3676 [43] X.Y. Wang S.Y. Yin K.L. Zhang Y.X. Zhang J. Alloys Compd. 486 2009 L5 [44] D. Jugović D. Uskoković J. Power Sources 190 2009 538