A New Interpretation of the Chapter Mutual Concealment of Offences among the Kin in the Analects

LIAO Ming-chun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-1763.2013.02.001
2013-01-01
Abstract:The character "yin"in the words "yin kuo","yin rou","yin shen","yin shi","yin he","yin du" should be read as "yin". Therefore, the chapter "fu wei zi yin, zi wei fu yin" in the article Zi Lu of The Analects is very likely to means that the father should correct his son, and the son should correct his father too. The Confucianism in pre-Qin, whose representative was Confucius, were not Consanguinist; they would abide by rules of morality when paternity conflict with public morality. So Confucius was not able to advocate concealment of offences for one’s father. There is no relationship between the concealment of offences for parents and the "lin er ren bu ke" in the Bamboo Slips of Nei Li in Shanghai Museum. To interpret this article in accordance with "ren bu ke" of Nei Li will violate the fundamental principle "Sincere" of Confucian behave.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?