Abstract:The study of the intestinal microflora has been developed mainly using conventional microbiological approaches.These studies have made great progress, but it is imperative that new methods will be applied to facilitate scientific progress.Polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) has been used to study microbial communities in many environmental samples.So, we must do our best to enhance the quality and accuracy of upstream analyses, such as DNA extraction.In this study, the relative efficacy of four DNA extraction methods (QIAamp DNA stool mini kit method, Q; QIAamp DNA stool mini kit+ Bead beating method, QB; QIAamp DNA stool mini kit+ Frozen thawed method, QF; E.Z.N.A. Stool DNA Kit method, E) were evaluated.Further, PCR-DGGE technique was also assessed in detecting diversity in infant intestinal bacterial fingerprint profiles.The total DNA was extracted from the infant fecal specimens using four different methods, followed by PCR amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA-V3 region, and DGGE separation of the amplifications.The number of extracted DNA of the infant feces using the Q method was larger than the QB, QF and E methods, and the produced bands of its DGGE profiles were more than the other three methods, which was due to its cracking temperature (95°C).We concluded that DGGE of 16S rRNA gene PCR products was suitable for capturing the profiles of the infant intestinal microbial community and the QIAamp DNA stool mini kit method was appropriate for infant fecal DNA extraction.PCR-DGGE could be an important tool for DNA studies.

Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods for Genotyping of Difficulty Mixed Stains

An Effective Method for Isolation of DNA from Pig Faeces and Comparison of Five Different Methods.

[Extraction of Sperm DNA from Mixed Stain by the Modified Differential Lysis Method Combined with Silicon Bead Method].

Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in supragingival plaque

Comparison of Three Methods of Genomic DNA Extraction from Fungus

Research on Genotyping of DNA Extracted from FFPE

Comparison of different extraction methods of genomic DNA from malt dextrin

COMPARISON OF DNA EXTRACTION METHODS FOR TGGE ANALYSIS IN MICRO-POLLUTED WATER

Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for Polymerase Chain Reaction-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) Analysis of the Infant Fecal Microbial Communities

Comparison of Five DNA Extraction Methods for Identification of Two Species Normally Caused Nosocomial Infection by Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergenic Consensus Polymerase Chain Reaction

A Comparison of Three Protocols for the Extraction of Total Fecal DNA

Examination on STR of Human Cast-off Cells on Vehicle

Chelex 100 as a Medium for Simple Extraction of DNA for PCR-Based Typing from Forensic Material

Comparison of 3 Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods Using Real-time Fluorescent Quantitative PCR

Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods from Human Blood Clots

Comparison and Improvement of Extraction Methods for Genomic DNA

Comparison of Different Extraction Methods of Genomic DNA from Soybean Powder

[Interpretation of DNA Profiles for Mixed Stains].

Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods on Bone and Blood Stains up to 43 Years Old and Amplification of Three Different Gene Sequences

Comparisons of Effects of Four Methods for Ancient DNA Extraction

Fluorescent Multiplex Amplification of Three X-STR Loci