Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in supragingival plaque

LIU Ying,WU Ming-tao,CHEN Hui,PANG Xiao-yan,ZHAO Li-ping,TANG Zi-sheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13591/j.cnki.kqyx.2011.03.008
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To find a bacteria DNA extraction method which is convenient,quick,cheap and also can get more bacteria information.Methods To extract supragingival plaque DNA of 3 chronic periodontitis patients with Washing+Freeze-Thawing+Bead Beater+Phenol-Chloroform Extraction(Method X),DNA Extraction Kit(Method Y),Washing+Freeze-Thawing+ DNA Extraction Kit(Method Z),Boiling(Method U) and Boiling With Chelex-100(Method V),and then analysed the length and concentration of DNA,include the microorganism diversity and similarity with Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis(DGGE),and assenss these DNA extraction methods from different aspects.Results DNA located 3kbp-20kbp in Method X and 500bp-20kbp in Method Y and Z;there was no significant DNA image in Method U;and in Method V DNA located 500bp-2kbp.The concentration of DNA was high in Method Y、 Z and V,however,it was low in Method X and U.There was no significant difference in the microorganism diversity of supragingival plaque in Method X、Y、Z and V.The similarity was high among Method X、Y and Z,but comparing Method V to Method X、Y and Z,the similarity was low.ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in Washing+ Freeze-Thawing+Bead Beater+Phenol-Chloroform Extraction,DNA Extraction Kit,Washing+Freeze-Thawing+ DNA Extraction Kit,and Boiling With Chelex-100.Boiling was not good enough for DNA extraction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?