Abstract:Both the host microbiome and the microbiome of the built environment can have profound impacts on human health. While prior studies have suggested that the variability introduced by DNA extraction method is less than typical biologic variation, most studies have focused on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing or on high biomass fecal samples. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing provides advantages over amplicon sequencing for surveying the microbiome, but is a challenge to perform in lower microbial biomass samples with high human DNA content such as sputum or vacuumed dust. Here we systematically evaluate the impact of four different extraction methods (phenol:choloroform, and three high-throughput kit-based approaches, the Promega Maxwell gDNA, Qiagen MagAttract PowerSoil DNA, and ZymoBIOMICS 96 MagBead). We report the variation in microbial community structure and predicted microbial function assessed by shotgun metagenomics sequencing in human stool, sputum, and vacuumed dust obtained from ongoing cohort studies or clinical trials. The same beadbeating protocol was used for all samples to focus our evaluation on the impact of kit chemistries on sequencing results. DNA yield was overall highest in the phenol:choloroform and Promega approaches. Only the phenol:choloroform approach showed evidence of contamination in negative controls. Bias was evaluated using mock community controls, and was noted across all extraction methods, although Promega exhibited the least amount of bias. The extraction method did not impact the proportion of human reads, although stool had the lowest proportion of human reads (0.1%) as compared to dust (44.1%) and sputum (80%). We calculated Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and Aitchison distances to evaluate the impact of extraction method on microbial community structure by sample type. Extraction method had the lowest impact in stool (extraction method responsible for 3.0-3.9% of the variability), the most impact in vacuumed dust (12-16% of the variability) and intermediate values for sputum (9.2-12% variability). Similar differences were noted when evaluating microbial community function. Our results will inform investigators planning microbiome studies using diverse sample types in large clinical studies. A consistent DNA extraction approach across all sample types is recommended, particularly with lower microbial biomass samples that are more heavily influenced by extraction method.

An attempt to prepare genomic DNA for human oral microbial metagenome

Evaluating the Impact of DNA Extraction Method on the Representation of Human Oral Bacterial and Fungal Communities

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for whole metagenome sequencing of human oral, vaginal, and rectal microbiome samples

Efficiency of chemical versus mechanical disruption methods of DNA extraction for the identification of oral Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria

Effect of Storage Conditions on the Extraction of PCR-quality Genomic DNA from Saliva.

Comparison of five DNA extraction methods in supragingival plaque

B-185 A Comparison Between Two Oral Sample Collection Devices on Preserving High-Quality Genomic DNA

Sample Collection, DNA Extraction, and Library Construction Protocols of the Human Microbiome Studies in the International Human Phenome Project

DNA Extraction from Soil for Molecular Microbial Community Analysis

Comparative Studies on the Methods of Bacterial Genomic DNA Extraction from Grasshopper Guts

Impact of DNA Extraction Method on Variation in Human and Built Environment Microbial Community and Functional Profiles Assessed by Shotgun Metagenomics Sequencing

Improved High-Throughput Sequencing of the Human Oral Microbiome: from Illumina to PacBio

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies

Optimised protocol of QIAamp® DNA mini Kit for bacteria genomic DNA extraction from both pure and mixture sample

Comparison and Improvement of Extraction Methods for Genomic DNA

Impact of DNA extraction method and targeted 16S-rRNA hypervariable region on oral microbiota profiling

Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for Polymerase Chain Reaction-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) Analysis of the Infant Fecal Microbial Communities

High-Quality and High-Yield RNA Extraction Method From Whole Human Saliva

Assessment of DNA extraction methods for human gut mycobiome analysis

A Method of Quickly Extracting DNA from Genome of Intestinal Microorganism

Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction