Abstract:Propensity score matching refers to a class of multivariate methods used in comparative studies to construct treated and matched control samples that have similar distributions on many covariates. This matching is the observational study analog of randomization in ideal experiments, but is far less complete as it can only balance the distribution of observed covariates, whereas randomization balances the distribution of all covariates, both observed and unobserved. An important feature of propensity score matching is that it can be easily combined with model-based regression adjustments or with matching on a subset of special prognostic covariates or combinations of prognostic covariates that have been identified as being especially predictive of the outcome variables. We extend earlier results by developing approximations for the distributions of covariates in matched samples created with linear propensity score methods for the practically important situation where matching uses both the estimated linear propensity scores and a set of special prognostic covariates. Such matching;on a subset of special prognostic covariates is an observational study analog of blocking in a randomized experiment. An example combining propensity score matching with Mahalanobis metric matching and regression adjustment is presented that demonstrates the flexibility of these methods for designing an observational study that effectively reduces both bias due to many observed covariates and bias and variability due to a more limited subset of covariates. Of particular importance, the general approach, which includes propensity score matching, was distinctly superior to methods that focus only on a subset of the prognostically most important covariates, even if those covariates account for most of the variation in the outcome variables. Also of importance, analyses based on matched samples were superior to those based on the full unmatched samples, even when regression adjustment was included.

Propensity Score Matching and Causal Inference: A methodological review

Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward

Propensity Score Method: a Non-Parametric Technique to Reduce Model Dependence

Recent Development Of Propensity Score Methods In Observational Studies: Multi-Categorical Treatment, Causal Mediation, And Heterogeneity

Propensity Score Augmentation in Matching-based Estimation of Causal Effects

Propensity score matching for estimating a marginal hazard ratio

[Application of Propensity Score Matching in the Design of an Epidemiological Study].

Theory and practice of propensity score analysis

Propensity Score–based Methods Versus MTE-based Methods in Causal Inference

Propensity score matching in SPSS

Comparing Covariate Prioritization via Matching to Machine Learning Methods for Causal Inference using Five Empirical Applications

Robust Estimating Method for Propensity Score Models and its Application to Some Causal Estimands: A review and proposal

A Comparative Study of Design-Based and Analysis-Based Approaches to Causal Inference with Observational Data

Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognostic Covariates

Uncertainty of Statistical Models and Propensity Score Methods

Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference

GBM Propensity Score Weighting for Causal Inference Research

Taking Causality Seriously: Propensity Score Methodology Applied to Estimate the Effects of Marketing Interventions

SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING

Propensity Score Adapted Covariate Selection for Causal Inference

Propensity Score Modeling: Key Challenges When Moving Beyond the No-Interference Assumption