Abstract: Propensity score methods have been shown to be powerful in obtaining efficient estimators of average treatment effect (ATE) from observational data, especially under the existence of confounding factors. When estimating, deciding which type of covariates need to be included in the propensity score function is important, since incorporating some unnecessary covariates may amplify both bias and variance of estimators of ATE. In this paper, we show that including additional instrumental variables that satisfy the exclusion restriction for outcome will do harm to the statistical efficiency. Also, we prove that, controlling for covariates that appear as outcome predictors, i.e. predict the outcomes and are irrelevant to the exposures, can help reduce the asymptotic variance of ATE estimation. We also note that, efficiently estimating the ATE by non-parametric or semi-parametric methods require the estimated propensity score function, as described in Hirano et al. (2003)\cite{Hirano2003}. Such estimation procedure usually asks for many regularity conditions, Rothe (2016)\cite{Rothe2016} also illustrated this point and proposed a known propensity score (KPS) estimator that requires mild regularity conditions and is still fully efficient. In addition, we introduce a linearly modified (LM) estimator that is nearly efficient in most general settings and need not estimation of the propensity score function, hence convenient to calculate. The construction of this estimator borrows idea from the interaction estimator of Lin (2013)\cite{Lin2013}, in which regression adjustment with interaction terms are applied to deal with data arising from a completely randomized experiment. As its name suggests, the LM estimator can be viewed as a linear modification on the IPW estimator using known propensity scores. We will also investigate its statistical properties both analytically and numerically.

Propensity Score Modeling: Key Challenges When Moving Beyond the No-Interference Assumption

Propensity Score Analysis: Recent Debate and Discussion

Uncertainty of Statistical Models and Propensity Score Methods

Recent Development Of Propensity Score Methods In Observational Studies: Multi-Categorical Treatment, Causal Mediation, And Heterogeneity

Estimating Causal Effects Under Interference Using Bayesian Generalized Propensity Scores

Propensity Score–based Methods Versus MTE-based Methods in Causal Inference

Propensity Score Matching and Causal Inference: A methodological review

Propensity Score Method: a Non-Parametric Technique to Reduce Model Dependence

Robust Estimating Method for Propensity Score Models and its Application to Some Causal Estimands: A review and proposal

Propensity Score Augmentation in Matching-based Estimation of Causal Effects

Variance Reduction for Causal Inference

Using Propensity Scores to Estimate Effects of Treatment Initiation Decisions: State of the Science

Uncertainty in Propensity Score Estimation: Bayesian Methods for Variable Selection and Model-Averaged Causal Effects

Propensity Score Adapted Covariate Selection for Causal Inference

[A Monte-Carlo Study for Propensity Score Methods].

Addressing Spatially Structured Interference in Causal Analysis Using Propensity Scores

Bayesian propensity scores for high-dimensional causal inference: A comparison of drug-eluting to bare-metal coronary stents

Propensity Score Methods for Creating Covariate Balance in Observational Studies

Theory and practice of propensity score analysis

The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

Propensity Score Analysis in Non-Randomized Experimental Designs: An Overview and a Tutorial Using R Software