Abstract:Matched sampling is a standard technique in the evaluation of treatments in observational studies. Matching on estimated propensity scores comprises an important class of procedures when there are numerous matching variables. Recent theoretical work (Rubin, D. B. and Thomas, N., 1992, The Annals of Statistics 20, 1079-1093) on affinely invariant matching methods with ellipsoidal distributions provides a general framework for evaluating the operating characteristics of such methods. Moreover, Rubin and Thomas (1992, Biometrika 79, 797-809) uses this framework to derive several analytic approximations under normality for the distribution of the first two moments of the matching variables in samples obtained by matching on estimated linear propensity scores. Here we provide a bridge between these theoretical approximations and actual practice. First, we complete and refine the nomal-based analytic approximations, thereby making it possible to apply these results to practice. Second, we perform Monte Carlo evaluations of the analytic results under normal and nonnormal ellipsoidal distributions, which confirm the accuracy of the analytic approximations, and demonstrate the predictable ways in which the approximations deviate from simulation results when normal assumptions are violated within the ellipsoidal family. Third, we apply the analytic approximations to real data with clearly nonellipsoidal distributions, and show that the theoretical expressions, although derived under artificial distributional conditions, produce useful guidance for practice. Our results delineate the wide range of settings in which matching on estimated linear propensity scores performs well, thereby providing useful information for the design of matching studies. When matching with a particular data set, our theoretical approximations provide benchmarks for expected performance under favorable conditions, thereby identifying matching variables requiring special treatment. After matching is complete and data analysis is at hand, our results provide the variances required to compute valid standard errors for common estimators.

Propensity Score Augmentation in Matching-based Estimation of Causal Effects

Propensity Score Method: a Non-Parametric Technique to Reduce Model Dependence

Propensity score matching for estimating a marginal hazard ratio

Covariate-adjusted Survival Analyses in Propensity-Score Matched Samples: Imputing Potential Time-to-event Outcomes.

Propensity Score Matching and Causal Inference: A methodological review

Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognostic Covariates

Propensity score matching with clustered data. An application to the estimation of the impact of caesarean section on the Apgar score

Comparing Propensity Score-Based Methods in Estimating the Treatment Effects: A Simulation Study

Estimating Average Treatment Effects with Continuous and Discrete Covariates: The Case of Swan-Ganz Catheterization

Propensity score analysis for time-dependent exposure

Multiply robust matching estimators of average and quantile treatment effects

Propensity Score Matching: A Statistical Method.

Tuning-parameter-free optimal propensity score matching approach for causal inference

Robust Estimating Method for Propensity Score Models and its Application to Some Causal Estimands: A review and proposal

Recent Development Of Propensity Score Methods In Observational Studies: Multi-Categorical Treatment, Causal Mediation, And Heterogeneity

Estimating and Using Propensity Scores with Partially Missing Data

[Application of Propensity Score Matching in the Design of an Epidemiological Study].

Matching methods for obtaining survival functions to estimate the effect of a time-dependent treatment

Matching Using Estimated Propensity Scores: Relating Theory to Practice

Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.

Uncertainty in Propensity Score Estimation: Bayesian Methods for Variable Selection and Model-Averaged Causal Effects