Abstract:Propensity score matching refers to a class of multivariate methods used in comparative studies to construct treated and matched control samples that have similar distributions on many covariates. This matching is the observational study analog of randomization in ideal experiments, but is far less complete as it can only balance the distribution of observed covariates, whereas randomization balances the distribution of all covariates, both observed and unobserved. An important feature of propensity score matching is that it can be easily combined with model-based regression adjustments or with matching on a subset of special prognostic covariates or combinations of prognostic covariates that have been identified as being especially predictive of the outcome variables. We extend earlier results by developing approximations for the distributions of covariates in matched samples created with linear propensity score methods for the practically important situation where matching uses both the estimated linear propensity scores and a set of special prognostic covariates. Such matching;on a subset of special prognostic covariates is an observational study analog of blocking in a randomized experiment. An example combining propensity score matching with Mahalanobis metric matching and regression adjustment is presented that demonstrates the flexibility of these methods for designing an observational study that effectively reduces both bias due to many observed covariates and bias and variability due to a more limited subset of covariates. Of particular importance, the general approach, which includes propensity score matching, was distinctly superior to methods that focus only on a subset of the prognostically most important covariates, even if those covariates account for most of the variation in the outcome variables. Also of importance, analyses based on matched samples were superior to those based on the full unmatched samples, even when regression adjustment was included.

Multiply robust matching estimators of average and quantile treatment effects

Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment

Differentiated Matching for Individual and Average Treatment Effect Estimation

Propensity Score Method: a Non-Parametric Technique to Reduce Model Dependence

Multiply robust estimation of the average treatment effect with missing outcomes

Tuning-parameter-free optimal propensity score matching approach for causal inference

Propensity Score Augmentation in Matching-based Estimation of Causal Effects

Balance Diagnostics after Propensity Score Matching.

Estimation of Average Treatment Effect Based on a Multi-Index Propensity Score.

Propensity score matching for estimating a marginal hazard ratio

Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognostic Covariates

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Causal effect estimation in survival analysis with high dimensional confounders

Propensity score analysis for time-dependent exposure

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects Via a High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

High Dimensional Propensity Score Estimation via Covariate Balancing

Doubly robust estimation of average treatment effect revisited

Doubly robust estimation for conditional treatment effect: a study on asymptotics

Robust Estimating Method for Propensity Score Models and its Application to Some Causal Estimands: A review and proposal

Tuning-parameter-free Propensity Score Matching Approach for Causal Inference under Shape Restriction

A nonparametric super-efficient estimator of the average treatment effect