Abstract:This research constructs a simple model to reveal the trade-off between decentralized and centralized governance structures of large state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China. Our model shows that delegating the decision-making authority to large SOE managers enhances their initiative in terms of local investment while also perhaps leading to the ex-post moral hazard problem. The managerial entrenchment effect causes a misalignment between large SOE managers’ personal interests and organizational interests. We construct a model by introducing a mechanism called the constrained-delegation governance structure approach to illustrate the issues, such that by eliminating some of large SOE managers’ managerial entrenchment investment choice through partially delegating SASAC (State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council) officials’ decision-making authority to the party committee within large SOEs, the trade-off between centralization and decentralization with respect to loss of control versus the local initiative can be resolved. We also show and discuss how the efficiency of the constrained delegation governance structure within Chinese large SOEs delivered through party committee control is mitigated with the presence of collusion between the party committee secretary and large SOE managers. By eliminating the self-selection endogeneity issues, some further empirical evidence including the robustness check shows that (1) the existence of a party committee could reduce the overinvestment problem of listed large SOEs, and that (2) the monitoring effect of the party committee is more pronounced when the CEO herself is a party member.

A Model Study on the Corporate Governance Performance of Shareholders Balance Mechanism

Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

Bank Financing and Corporate Governance

Ownership Structure,Resolution Mechanism and Control Right of Listed Companies

Why do Large Shareholders Encroach on Small Shareholders' Advantage Rather Than Protect Their Advantage

The Model of Board Structure on the Condition of Several Large Shareholders Existing

Counterbalance Mechanism of Blockholders and Tunneling of Cash Dividend: Evidences from Chinese Listed Companies from 1999 to 2003

Tunneling Through Allies: Affiliated Shareholders, Insider Trading, and Monitoring Failure

Debt of Bank, Institutional Environment and the Agent Cost of Controlling Shareholder

Blockholders counterbalance, interaction effects and cash dividend

Controlling Shareholders’ Tunneling and Executive Compensation: Evidence from China

Toward a Theory of Internal Governance Structure of China’s Large SOEs

Tunneling Through Intercorporate Loans: the China Experience☆

Tunneling and Propping of the Controlling Shareholders:the Effect of Corporate Income Tax

Dynamic Analysis of Large Shareholders' Private Benefits from Control Power

Multi-Factor Collaborative Governance of Controlling Shareholder Expropriation Behavior in Emerging Economies: A Perspective of Double Principal-Agent Conflicts

Earnings Management to Tunnel: Evidence from China's Listed Companies

Controlling shareholder’s ownership, control rights and related-party transactions – analysis of regulatory effects based on board characteristics

Some Thoughts on Stakeholder Model of Corporate Governance

Controlling Shareholder, Expropriations and Firm's Leverage Decision: Evidence from Chinese Non-Tradable Share Reform