Abstract:This study concerns about the different incentives of con-trolling shareholder and management in cash dividend policies. Dif-ferent from previous studies,we examine this issue based on board structure and ownership concentration data and thus obtain quite different results. Using all the A-share companies from year 1999 to 2004 as a sample,this paper examines management’s influence on cash dividend,analyzes the largest shareholder’s incentive in cash dividend,and explore the largest shareholder’s monitoring toward management. It shows that,firms with a combined title of board chair and CEO (CMB) tend to have lower cash dividends,firms that have higher managerial membership on the board tend to pay lower cash dividends,and firms that have higher ownership concentration tend to pay higher cash dividends. This study further shows that the largest shareholder’s controlling rights tend to weaken the as-sociation between CMB and lower cash dividends; it also shows that higher controlling rights of the largest shareholder tends to weaken the association between managerial membership on the board and lower cash dividends. Taken together,this paper supports the agency theory and monitoring role of the largest shareholder: managements are reluctant to pay cash dividends,but the largest shareholder can monitor the managements’ dividend policy; Still,shareholding of the largest shareholder may conduce to the effectiveness of the monitoring and assuage agency cost. This study provides insightful political implications: by making the previous non-tradable state-owned shares to be tradable,the split share structure reform tends to align the interest of controlling shareholders and minority share-holders. In the subsequent reforms,however,it is not rational to diversify the shareholding excessively. Once the largest shareholder and management are of different entities,it is more efficient to let the largest shareholder to dominate the board and monitor the be-havior of senior managements.

Blockholders counterbalance, interaction effects and cash dividend

Counterbalance Mechanism of Blockholders and Tunneling of Cash Dividend: Evidences from Chinese Listed Companies from 1999 to 2003

Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China

Family control and corporate cash holdings: evidence from China

Corporate Ownership Structure and Cash Holding in Family Controlled Firms: Evidence from the NTS Reform in China

Share Liquidity ,balance Mechanism of Shareholders and Tunneling of Cash Dividend: Evidences from Chinese Listed Companies from 1999 to 2003

Political Connections and Firm’S Dividend Policy: Evidence from Chinese Privately Owned Firms

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

Tunneling Dividends

Bank Financing and Corporate Governance

Control rights and cash dividends: A moderating effect of product market competition

The Largest Shareholder's Monitoring on Management's Cash Dividend Policy

Dividend Policy,the Largest Shareholder and Firm Growth:Free Cash Flow vs.Tunneling

Dividends for tunneling in a regulated economy: The case of China

The downside of blockholder exit threats: Increasing excess cash holdings

Controlling Shareholders’ Tunneling and Executive Compensation: Evidence from China

Collateral damage: Evidence from share pledging in China

Blockholder exit threats and corporate cash holdings

Corporate Cash Reserves and Corporate Governance Mechanism: the Empirical Study of the Chinese Publicly Traded Corporations

Tunneling Through Allies: Affiliated Shareholders, Insider Trading, and Monitoring Failure

Impacts of Mechanism of Blockholders Counterbalance on the Effectiveness of Auditing Constraints