On the superior hot hardness and softening resistance of AlCoCrxFeMo0.5Ni high-entropy alloys
Chin-You Hsu,Chien-Chang Juan,Woei-Ren Wang,Tsing-Shien Sheu,Jien-Wei Yeh,Swe-Kai Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.072
2011-01-01
Abstract:Effects of Cr content on microstructures and hot hardness of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni high-entropy alloys ( x = 0–2.0) were investigated. The cast microstructure of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni consists of B2 and σ phases, both being multi-element solid solutions. Increasing Cr content increases the volume fraction of σ phase and causes the matrix phase of the dendrite to change from B2 phase to σ phase. The alloy hardness increases from Hv 601 at x = 0 to Hv 867 at x = 2.0 as a result of increasing amount of hard σ phase. A phase diagram for the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloy system is constructed based on SEM, HTXRD and DTA analyses, providing useful information for understanding and designing high-entropy alloys. All the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys possess higher hot-hardness level than that of Ni-based superalloys, In 718 and In 718 H, from room temperature to 1273 K. Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys exhibit a transition temperature higher than that of Co-based alloy T-800 by about 200 K and have respective hardness values, Hv 374 and Hv 450 at 1273 K, being much higher than those, around Hv 127, of In 718 and In 718 H. The mechanism of larger strengthening and softening resistance is related with B2 and σ phases, both having multi-principal-element effect. The AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloy system has a potential in high-temperature applications. Keywords Hardness measurement Non-ferrous alloys Casting 1 Introduction Conventionally, alloy design was based on one major metal element [1,2] . In 1995, a novel alloy design concept utilizing high mixing entropy to design high-entropy alloys (hereafter called HEAs) has been proposed [3] . By this, HEAs were defined to contain at least five major metal elements, each has a concentration between 5 at % and 35 at %. HEAs might exhibit attractive properties, such as high hardness, good thermal stability, high elevated-temperature strength, and good corrosion resistance explaining their potential applications in different aspects [4–14] . In this study, AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys are derived from a previous Al–Co–Cr–Cu–Fe–Ni alloy system which has received significant studies [8,15–17] . Although this previous system exhibits a wide spectrum of microstructure and provides attractive mechanical properties, Cu segregation in the interdendrite region is the common feature which is harmful for hot working and high-temperature strength due to the incipient melting point of Cu segregation. To overcome this drawback and to increase the softening resistance at high temperatures, Mo is used to replace Cu in view of its high melting point and elastic modulus. The molar amount of Mo is designed to be one half of Al, Co, Fe, and Ni for not increasing too much cost but having its significant effect. Cr content is varied to see its effect and optimization on the microstructure and room temperature and high-temperature properties. Phase diagram with two variables of temperature and Cr content is built up to enhance the understanding and utilization of this alloy system. For assessing the strength and softening resistance of the present alloys and commercial elevated-temperature alloys, in situ hot hardness measurement was performed in this study. Similar tests were also performed for tools, molds and superalloys in literature [18,19] . In analysis of hot hardness data, an equation form proposed by Westbrook is well known for identifying the softening resistance and revealing the softening mechanism [20] : (1) H = A e − B T where H = hardness in kg mm −2 ; T = test temperature in K; and A , B = constants. The constant A is called intrinsic hardness and B is softening coefficient or thermal coefficient of hardness. By this equation, two sets of A and B constants are commonly obtained at low- and high-temperature ranges corresponding to two different deformation mechanisms. At low-temperature region the major deformation mechanism of softening is slip, while at high-temperature region the major deformation mechanisms of softening are related with diffusional phenomenon, such as (1) slip along more than one slip system due to increased atomic mobility, (2) dislocation climb, and (3) grain boundary rotation [21,22] . 2 Material and methods Table 1 shows the designated compositions of experimental AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys (Cr– x alloy hereafter represent the alloy with chromium content x in molar ratio). Raw elemental material, Al, Co, Cr, Fe, and Ni with purity higher than 99 wt % and master alloy, Fe-61.5 wt % Mo, were melted to prepare the alloys by using arc-melting method under argon atmosphere. Four times of re-melting and re-solidification were performed for each sample to ensure the uniformity in composition. Microstructure and compositions were analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL-5410) attached with X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS). Crystal structures were examined with X-Ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku ME510-FM2) at 30 kV and 20 mA with a scanning rate of 4°/min from 30° to 90°. Room-temperature Vickers hardness measurements were performed using a hardness tester (MATSUZAWA SEIKI MV-1) with a load of 5 kg and duration time of 15 s. Five points of indentation were taken to obtain an average hardness. The melting and phase transformation temperatures were determined using a differential thermal analyzer (DTA, Pyris Diamond TG/DTA) at a heating rate of 0.33 K/s. The in situ X-ray diffraction to identify the thermal stability and phase transformation were performed with a high temperature X-ray diffractometer (HTXRD, SHIMADZU Lab X XRD-6000) equipped with a vacuum heating stage (Anton Parr HTK 1200N). The operation conditions were 30 kV and 20 mA for the X-ray tube, 4°/min for scanning speed, and 20–100° for scanning range. A vacuum level of near 1.5 × 10 −4 Torr was maintained in the chamber using a turbo pump throughout the measurements. The XRD patterns were recorded at various temperatures with 100 K interval from 573 K to 1373 K. The heating rate from one temperature to the next was 50 K/min and the holding time before diffraction is 5 min. Hot hardness measurement was conducted with a high-temperature hardness tester (Akashi AVK-CO) equipped with a heating and vacuum part (Akashi AVK-HF). A load of 5 kg and dwell time of 15 s were used. The chamber was purged with argon and then evacuated to 1.9 × 10 −4 Torr for three times and finally filled with argon to a pressure close to 1 atm before measuring. The test temperatures were from 573 K to 1273 K at an interval of 100 K. Heating rate was 10 K/min for each temperature increase. For each temperature at least three indentations were taken to get an average value of hardness. The specimens for hot hardness measurements were 1.5 mm in thickness and 10 mm in diameter. They were ground and polished by standard metallographic procedure. Final polish was done with diamond paste of 1 μm grade. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Microstructure and constituent phases Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys in the as-cast state. Only two phases: B2 ( a = 2.87 Å) and σ phase ( a = 8.87 Å and c = 4.62 Å) are identified. This reveals the interesting phenomena that although AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys have six principal elements, the number of phases is much less than the maximum number of phases allowed by Gibbs phase rule. This phenomenon has been generally found in previous high-entropy alloys. It has been attributable to the high entropy effect which interferes the complexity among multi-principal elements and enhances the mutual solubility of different elements and the stability of solid solution phases [3,6–11,15–17] . In the present alloys, one is solid-solution B2 phase and the other is solid-solution σ phase. σ Phase is similar to that of the binary intermediate phase CoCr, which is a body-centered tetragonal structure with lattice constants of a = 8.81 Å and c = 4.56 Å according to the JCPDS card. It in effect is a solution-type intermediate phase since σ phase exists in several related binary and ternary phase diagrams, i.e., Co–Cr, Fe–Cr, Ni–Mo, Fe–Mo, Fe–Cr–Mo, Cr–Mo–Ni, Co–Fe–Mo, Fe–Co–Cr, and Al–Mo–Ni [23] and show significant solubility for Co, Cr, Fe, Ni, and Mo but much less for Al. For such a multi-element σ phase, Co, Fe, and Ni occupy the same site whereas Cr and Mo occupy the other same site in the crystal structure. Therefore, the multi-element σ phase is in fact a solution phase of CoCr, FeCr, NiMo, and FeMo intermediate phases. From the practical viewpoint such a multi-element σ phase is very probable to have improved hardness and toughness since more kinds of solute atoms could increase the lattice distortion to enhance solution hardening, and also reduce the degree of long-range order to enhance toughness. In addition, multi-element σ phase could be fine in morphology due to the sluggish diffusion of atoms in the multi-element matrix [3,6] . This could further improve hardness and toughness. Fig. 2 shows the SEM backscattered electron images of the as-cast AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys. The chemical compositions of different regions and phases were obtained by EDS and listed in Table 2 . Fig. 2 (a) shows the microstructure of the Cr-0 alloy, which has dendrite phase (labeled as A) and interdendrite phase with eutectic structure (labeled as B). Table 2 indicates that the dendrite phase has higher Al and Ni contents than those of the overall composition whereas the interdendrite phase has higher Mo content. Since the small gray phase in the eutectic region is the same as the dendrite phase, it is expected the white phase would contain even higher amount of Mo. Therefore, from the XRD and composition analysis of constituent phases, it leads to that the gray phase of Cr-0 alloy is a B2 phase and the white phase in the interdendrite eutectic structure is σ phase. Fig. 2 (b) and (c) shows that the Cr-0.5 and Cr-1.0 alloys contain no eutectic regions but exhibit a simple dendritic structure composing of dendrite (labeled as A) and interdendrite (labeled as B). It can be seen that both dendrite and interdendrite display modulated structure like the spinodal decomposition structure as reported for Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys [17] . The characteristic width and spacing in the modulated structure are in the order of submicron meter. Table 2 shows that the overall composition of dendrites is rich in Al and Ni whereas that of the interdendrites is rich in Cr and Mo. This suggests that the Al- and Ni-rich dendrite with B2 structure first forms and then due to the partitioning of more Cr and Mo to liquid phase upon subsequent cooling, Cr- and Mo-rich interdendrite with B2 structure forms as the outer envelope of the cored dendrite. Because of the difference in Cr and Mo contents, the B2 dendrite precipitates out a smaller volume fraction of fine σ phase (white phases) but the B2 interdendrite precipitates out larger volume fraction of σ phase in the cooling stage after solidification. The precipitation results in modulated structures (white phase is σ and gray phase is B2) both in dendrite and interdendrite. Figs. 2 (d) and (e) shows the microstructures of Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys. It reveals that the volume fraction of gray phase (labeled as A) is remarkably reduced whereas that of white phase increases. From the composition analysis, region A is rich in Al and Ni, whereas region B is rich in Cr and Mo. Thus referring to the phase morphology and distribution it can be depicted that for Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloy the Cr- and Mo-rich primary dendrite (B2) first form, then Al- and Ni-rich gray phase (B2) forms in the dendrite front. After solidification, Al- and Ni- rich precipitates form in the Cr- and Mo-rich primary dendrite which is turned into σ phase, while σ phase precipitates forms in the Al- and Ni-rich gray phase. Fig. 2 also shows that the relative amount of σ phase to that of B2 phase increases as the Cr content increases from x = 0 to x = 2.0, indicating that the element Cr is an σ phase stabilizer. 3.2 DTA analysis and high temperature XRD patterns of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys Fig. 3 shows the DTA curves of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys. Solidus temperatures are identified at the onsets of melting which cause specimen's shape to collapse with a certain degree. It can be seen that the melting point increases with Cr content as Cr has a melting point of 2148 K. Dissolution temperature of σ phase cannot be identified in the DTA curves. Direct annealing treatment at the temperature up to 1593 K and subsequently water quenching does not dissolve the σ phase as proven by XRD. This suggests that the dissolution temperature of σ phase is very close to the solidus temperature. Fig. 4 presents the XRD patterns of the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys in situ taken at different temperatures from room temperature to 1373 K. Phase transformation points can been identified from these patterns, which delineate the boundary line between phase regions in phase diagram as plotted in Section 3.3 . The Cr-0, Cr-0.5 and Cr-1.0 alloys have B2 and σ phase at low temperatures, however an FCC phase is newly formed at 1073 K. No new phase is found for Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys which has B2 and σ phase at all the testing temperatures. 3.3 Phase diagram The phase diagram of the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloy system with various Cr contents is constructed to a first approximation according to the results of microstructure, HTXRD and DTA analyses as shown in Fig. 5 . At the Cr content from x = 0–1.0, the equilibrium phases in the temperature from 1073 K to solidus line are FCC + B2 + σ while those below 1073 K is B2 + σ. However, it has been found that the B2 phase first form during the solidification and the FCC phase is inhibited but σ phase forms during the cooling in copper mold. At x = 1.5 and 2.0, the equilibrium phases below solidus line is B2 + σ. In the present casting process, σ and B2 phases form during solidification and remain in the subsequent cooling. Because the phase transformation temperatures have been obtained by heating curves in DTA analyses and double-checked with HTXRD, the phase diagram can be regarded close to equilibrium condition. According to the phase rule F = C − P + 1 ( F : degrees of freedom, C : number of components, and P : number of phases) [24] , the degrees of freedom for any single phase in this six-component alloy system equal to six, that for two phase equal to five and that for three phase equal to four. This suggests that concentrations of the six components in these solid solution phases could be varied within a range of composition and temperature under the degrees of freedom. 3.4 Mechanical properties of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys 3.4.1 Room-temperature hardness and crack length of indentation Fig. 6 shows the room-temperature Vickers hardness and overall crack length around diamond pyramid indentation of as-cast AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys as functions of Cr content. Those of the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys [8] from which the present alloy were derived are compared to see the property improvement. The variation of hardness shown in Fig. 6 (a) can be related with the relative volume fractions of hard σ phase and less hard B2 phase. Evidences have shown that σ phase is the hardest phase since microhardness measurements on the dendrite (with less σ phase) and the interdendrite (with more σ phase) in the Cr-1.0 alloy give Hv 634 and Hv 824, respectively. Therefore, the alloy hardness increase with increased volume fraction of σ phase as the Cr content increases from x = 0 to x = 2.0. For the variation of crack length which is an indicator of fracture toughness [25] , it can be found from Fig. 6 (a) that the crack length increases and thus toughness decreases as hardness increases. This follows the general trend in materials. From the comparison of the hardness and crack length levels between the present alloys and the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys [8] , it can be seen that the present alloys are superior in the aspects of hardness and fracture toughness. For example, with the same value of hardness (Hv 600), the Cr-0 alloy has no cracks around the indentation, but the Al 2.3 CoCrCuFeNi alloy having a crack length about 100 μm. Furthermore, Cr-1.0, Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys have higher hardness (above Hv 700) than the hardest one of the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys (i.e., x = 2.8), but their crack lengths are smaller. The hardness superiority is attributable to the high volume fraction of σ phase in the present alloys since σ phase is much harder than BCC phase which is the main strengthening phase in the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys. As for the strength–toughness superiority, it is not clear about the exact mechanism, but it indeed suggests that the present fine modulated structure of B2 and σ phases is better than the modulated structure of B2 and BCC phases in the Al x CoCrCuFeNi alloys. 3.4.2 Hot hardness Fig. 7 shows the variations of hot hardness ( H ) with temperature ( T ) for the AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys, Ni-based superalloys of In 718 (as-received) and In 718 H (precipitation hardened), and Co-based superalloy of Tribaloy T-800 (data are obtained from Stellite Company website). The compositions of In 718 and T-800 are noted in Table 3 . It can be seen that the curves of Cr-0 and Cr-0.5 alloys are lower than that of T-800 below 900 K but higher above 900 K since the hardness value of T-800 decreases at a faster rate. In addition, Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys are much higher in hardness than that of T-800, In 718 and In 718 H, and have a transition temperature higher than that of T-800 by around 200 K and close to that of In 718 and In 718 H. Cr-2.0 alloy exhibits the highest hot hardness of about Hv 450 at 1273 K, which is around 3.5 folds of the hardness values, ∼Hv 127, of In 718 and In 718 H. It is noted that In 718 is the only one to show the abnormal heating behavior (i.e., hardness increase with temperature increase) in the temperature range from 873 K to 1073 K, which is mainly attributable to the precipitation hardening effect as evidenced by the precipitation hardening used to strengthen In 718 H. In 718 becomes soften at a faster rate and has similar hardness to In 718 H at above 1073 K. The data in Fig. 7 are re-plotted as Fig. 8 by using ln(H) vs. T . The variation trends can be represented by two straight lines which intersect in the temperature range 970–1100 K, suggesting two different deformation mechanisms [20] as mentioned in the Introduction section. The values of transition temperature ( T T ), intrinsic hardness ( A ), and softening coefficient ( B ) calculated according to Westbrook [20] are summarized in Table 3 . It shows that Cr-0 and Cr-0.5 alloys have almost the same intrinsic hardness, softening coefficient, and transition temperature. As Cr content increases, A I becomes more positive (due to higher intrinsic harness) and B I becomes more negative (due to a larger softening), whereas A II and B II have no trends. But it is noted that the Cr-1.0 and Cr-2.0 alloys have the least negative B II values (due to the least softening). These least negative values of B II are about half that of In 718, suggesting that Cr-1.0 and Cr-2.0 alloys could sustain its strength up to 1273 K very effectively. Furthermore, all the present alloys have less negative value of B II as compared to those of In 718, In 718 H and T-800, revealing their potential in high-temperature applications. It is interesting to see that the softening coefficients, B II , of pure metals such as Mo, Ni, Cr, Si and Fe [26] are more negative by two order magnitudes than those of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys, In 718, and T-800, indicating that alloying indeed has tremendous effect on the softening behavior at elevated temperatures. As AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni contains a substantial volume fraction of σ phase, which increases with increasing the Cr content, it suggests the σ phase is the main strengthener not only at room temperature but also at high temperatures. This is an important finding. Multi-element solution hardening is believed to have important contributions to the strength and the resistance to softening. For the region below transition temperature where the deformation mechanism is slip, multi-element solid-solution phases such as B2 and σ phase would have a larger resistance to slip deformation because of solution hardening mechanism. This is reasonable since, even at high temperatures, the matrix is still effectively strengthened by highly concentrated solute atoms according to the mechanism of solution hardening. Furthermore, for the region above transition temperature where the major deformation mechanism is diffusional phenomenon, multi-element solid-solution phases with highly concentrated solute atoms also have the benefit to resist creep deformation as the vacancies in the matrix is limited in concentration and interact with all atoms to reduce the strain and thus strain energy around each vacancies. This interaction would render vacancies more difficult to migrate from one site to next site to assist the creep deformation as compared with the case with a host matrix. 4 Conclusions 1. The cast microstructure of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni consists of B2 and σ phases, both being multi-element solid solutions. Increasing Cr content increases the volume fraction of σ phase and causes the matrix phase of the dendrite to change from B2 phase to σ phase. 2. Schematic phase diagram of AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni is constructed according to microstructure, HTXRD, and DTA analyses providing valuable information for alloy design and prediction. 3. Cr-2.0 alloy is the hardest one due to its highest volume fraction of hard σ phase. 4. AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys exhibit a combination of hardness and toughness superior to that of the alloy system Al x CoCrCuFeNi from which it derives. 5. All AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys possess higher hardness values than that of Ni-based superalloys, In 718 and In 718 H, at temperatures from room temperature to 1273 K. 6. Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys have a transition temperature higher than that of T-800 by around 200 K but close to that of In 718 and In 718 H. 7. Cr-1.5 and Cr-2.0 alloys exhibit hot hardness values of around Hv 374 and Hv 450 at 1273 K, respectively, being much higher than Hv 127 of In 718 and In 718 H. Furthermore, the Cr-2.0 alloy displays the lowest softening coefficient that is only half that of In 718. 8. The present AlCoCr x FeMo 0.5 Ni alloys show good softening resistance in both temperature regimes for dislocation-slip deformation and creep deformation, respectively. Besides the main strengthening from hard σ phase and less hard B2 phase, significant solution hardening and lower vacancy mobility due to multi-principal-element composition have contributions to softening resistance. Acknowledgements The authors are pleased to acknowledge the financial support for this research by Ministry of Economic Affairs R.O.C. under grant no. 97-EC-17-A-08-S1-03 . References [1] H. Committee ASM Handbook, Properties and Selection: Irons Steels, and High Performance Alloys 10 ed. 1990 ASM International [2] H. Committee ASM Handbook, Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials 10 ed. 1990 ASM International [3] J.W. Yeh S.K. Chen S.J. Lin J.Y. Gan T.S. Chin T.T. Shun C.H. Tsau S.Y. Chang Adv. Eng. Mater. 6 2004 299 303 [4] C.H. Lai K.H. Cheng S.J. Lin J.W. Yeh Surf. Coat. Technol. 202 2008 3732 3738 [5] S.Y. Chang D.S. Chen Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 2009 3 [6] J.W. Yeh Ann. Chim.-Sci. Mater. 31 2006 633 648 [7] P.K. Huang J.W. Yeh T.T. Shun S.K. Chen Adv. Eng. Mater. 6 2004 74 78 [8] C.J. Tong M.R. Chen S.K. Chen J.W. Yeh T.T. Shun S.J. Lin S.Y. Chang Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36A 2005 1263 1271 [9] Y.Y. Chen U.T. Hong H.C. Shih J.W. Yeh T. Duval Corros. Sci. 47 2005 2679 2699 [10] Y.J. Zhou Y. Zhang Y.L. Wang G.L. Chen Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 2007 3 [11] Y.J. Zhou Y. Zhang F.J. Wang Y.L. Wang G.L. Chen J. Alloy. Compd. 466 2008 201 204 [12] T.T. Shun Y.C. Du J. Alloy. Compd. 479 2009 157 160 [13] M.H. Tsai C.W. Wang C.H. Lai J.W. Yeh J.Y. Gan Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 2008 3 [14] X.F. Wang Y. Zhang Y. Qiao G.L. Chen Intermetallics 15 2007 357 362 [15] C.Y. Hsu J.W. Yeh S.K. Chen T.T. Shun Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35A 2004 1465 1469 [16] C.C. Tung J.W. Yeh T.T. Shun S.K. Chen Y.S. Huang H.C. Chen Mater. Lett. 61 2007 1 5 [17] C.J. Tong Y.L. Chen S.K. Chen J.W. Yeh T.T. Shun C.H. Tsau S.J. Lin S.Y. Chang Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36A 2005 881 893 [18] J. Sato T. Omori K. Oikawa I. Ohnuma R. Kainuma K. Ishida Science 312 2006 90 91 [19] R.S. Sundar T.R.G. Kutty D.H. Sastry Intermetallics 8 2000 427 437 [20] G.E. Dieter Mechanical Metallurgy 1988 SI Metric McGraw-Hill [21] V.P.K.V.A. Borisenko Acta Metall. 25 1977 251 256 [22] K.B. Khana T.R.G. Kutty M.K. Surappa Mater. Sci. Eng. A 427 2006 76 82 [23] H. Committee ASM Handbook, Alloy Phase Diagrams 10 ed. 1992 ASM International [24] R.A. Swalin Thermodynamics of Solids 2nd ed. 1972 John Wiley & Sons Inc. [25] W.D. Schubert H. Neumeister G. Kinger B. Lux Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 16 1998 133 142 [26] A. Okada Y. Yamamoto R. Yoda Tetsu To Hagane: J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 73 1987 1186 1192