For-Profit Provision of Education As a Quasi-Public Good

CHEN Xiao-yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2012.01.016
2012-01-01
Abstract:Empirical evidence shows the Quasi-public attributes of education in China,which justifies public subsidies as well as user charges.Theory of public goods does not necessarily lead to public provision of education.Subsidy and provision can be separated by mechanisms such as education vouchers.The necessity of public education subsidy lies in the nature of education products instead of the provider's status.For-profit and non-profit sectors have their advantages and disadvantages in education provision respectively.For-profit institutions were the first to step in when there is social demand for education unsatisfied by their traditional non-profit counterparts.The past several decades saw rapid expansion of proprietary education in many countries,while the services and clients of the two sectors are more complementary than overlapped.There exists for-profit motivations and possibility of profit-making in Chinese Minban Education,but the current non-profit restriction is exaggerating the profitability.For-profit provision of education is gaining legitimacy in the future policy reform in China.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?