Abstract:Purpose: China has a long history of private school education. Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, nongovernmental education (private school education) once disappeared from Chinese society until its revival following the 3rd Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. With its development of more than four decades, nongovernmental education has become an important part of China’s educational system and is vigorously promoting the modernization progress of Chinese education. Design/Approach/Methods: Being different from the overseas private school education, which is mostly funded by donations, China’s nongovernmental education sector has operated on the basis of private capital investments and contributions, with the organizers (contributors) typically expecting economic returns. Marked by the introduction of regulations and policies for nongovernmental education around the year of 2016, China’s nongovernmental education sector officially entered a new era of registration, support, and regulation by category. Findings: The macroscopic policies of China’s nongovernmental education in new era present the following new characters: (I) Emphasizing education provision as a public interest and comprehensively strengthening private school leadership; (II) managing negative lists and broadening the means by which social forces participate in operating schools; (III) implementing preferential policies for private schools through categories based on the principle of being fair but different; (IV) supporting the development of private schools with the goal of improving education quality; (V) standardizing private schools’ operating practices in order to promote healthy and orderly development. Originality/Value: The implementing of the new policies on nongovernmental education shall have significant impact on the development and reform of China’s nongovernmental education in the future: (1) The rapid development of nonprofit private schools due to government support; (2) for-profit private schools may face polarization in a fiercely competitive market environment; (3) heavy burden of categorizing and transferring existing stock of schools due to various historical and realistic constraints.

A comparison of policies for private higher educationin China, Japan and South Korea

Comparative Study of and Enlightenment from Private Higher Education Policies of the U.S.,Japan and South Korea

Comparative Analysis of Chinese and American Higher Education Policies

A comparative study of the development of the private higher education in Indonesia and China

On the Financial Policy of Private Higher Education in South Korea, Malaysia and the Philippines

Some Thoughts about Modern Chinese Private Institution of Higher Learning

Economic Analysis of Policies of China's Private Education

Private Higher Education in China: Access to Quality Higher Education and the Acquisition of Labour Market Qualifications by Low-Income Students1

Comparative Study on the Internationalization of Higher Education in China and Japan

Policies on Private Education: An Economics Analysis

Japan's education policy for oversea students and some indications for China

Global Expansion of Private Higher Education and Relevant Policies——Analysis of Report Documents of 2009 World Conference on Higher Education

History of the development of non-state higher education after the implementation of the policy of reform and opening in China

A Comparative Study of Higher Education Governance in Greater China

China’s New Laws and Policies on Nongovernmental Education: Background, Characteristics, and Impact Analysis

Analysis on Impetus of Korean Mass and Universalized Higher Education after World WarⅡ

A Comparison between the World-class University Construction Policy in China and COE Policy in Japan

Development of English Education Policy in Japan and Korea and Its Enlightenment

Policies and Problems of Online Higher Education in China: What We Can Learn from the Development of "internet Colleges"

Comparison and inspiration of the selection system for primary school pre service teachers in China, Japan, and South Korea

Higher Education Massification:Experience and Lesson from Japan