Abstract:Digitalization has expanded the scope of citizen participation. Nevertheless, there are no conclusive findings on online citizen participation and inclusive policymaking. This study adds in line with the discussion with a fresh perspective of institutional bias. It presents new evidence by examining the process, participants, policy agenda, and sentiments of public opinions from the government-led and Internet-empowered citizen participation regarding the 2017–2035 Shanghai Master Plan. Four findings are reported based on the in-depth case study with text and sentiment analysis. First, the government-led model provides institutionalized opportunities for citizen engagement throughout the policy process, while the Internet-empowered citizen participation is characterized by contingency and ad hoc. Second, the government-led model remains elite-dominated, while the Internet empowers a wider scope of stakeholders with an open and popularized participation platform. Third, the public opinion from the Internet-empowered model often goes beyond or even against the pre-defined official principles and goals. In contrast, the civic discussion in the government-led model influences policy by changing the sequence of policy agenda or providing focus within the official setting. Fourth, citizens, especially the experts, are more likely to give positive feedback in the government-led model than the Internet-empowered approach. These findings confirm and identify the remaining institutional bias that hinders inclusive policymaking in the Internet age. Theoretically, it reminds scholars to examine the institutional arrangements regarding citizen participation carefully. Practically, it indicates that the central government could facilitate inclusive policymaking at the local level by reducing the institutional bias of the government-led approach and utilizing text and sentiment analysis to urge the local government's response to Internet-empowered public opinion.

The deliberative democracy in the process of making the health system reform policy

Government-led and Internet-empowered Citizen Participation in China's Policymaking: A Case Study of the Shanghai 2035 Master Plan.

Making a Competitive Selection or a Compromise?—An Explanatory Framework and a Consensus-centered Model in the Process of Policymaking in China's Economic Transition

A Comparative Analysis of Public Participation Approaches in Environmental Decision-Making in Western Countries

A Study on the Reform and Improvement of Decision-Making Mechanisms in the University——Analysis Based on the Perspective of Deliberative Democracy

Public Policy-Making Hearing:Value and Limitation of Administrative Democracy

Political elites in deliberative democracy: beliefs and behaviors of Chinese officials

The Democratic Limitation and Procedural Justice of Public Hearing

What's "Good" Health Policy

MEDIA PRESSURE AND THE IMPROVEMENT OF AIR QUALITY

Discussion on Driving Factors and Dynamic System of Health Governance Reform

The Internal Logic Between the Network of Public Opinion and the Government Decision-making Generated

The Class Relations of the Context of the Deliberative Democracy and the Media Construction

Hybrid deliberation: Citizen dialogues in a post-pandemic era

The Participation of Community and Social Policies in Network Discourse of Democracy

Models and Principles of Public Policy Participation

An Exploration of Analytical Framework of Agenda Setting and an Explanation of Institutional Reform of the State Council

Three Perspectives to Understand Public Policy Process and their Implications for China Study

Consensus and disagreement of evaluating public interest of public medical institutions from the point of view of the consultant

Advancing Journalism Surveillance of Public Opinion from the Democratic Stature

Citizen Deliberation and the Development of Grassroots Democracy in China