Abstract:In this paper, we investigate whether audit firms take measures to improve their audit quality subsequent to government sanctions in imperfect institutional settings. Using data from the emerging markets of China, we find that audit firms with damaged or shredded reputations have lower audit quality prior to the publicized accounting scandals and related disciplinary actions than non-sanctioned audit firms. The lower audit quality is particularly prevalent in less developed regions and smaller audit firms. Audit firms with shredded reputations significantly increased their audit quality after the disciplinary actions regardless of whether they are bigten or small audit firms. Such an improvement is more significant in state owned client firms, less developed regions, and firms sanctioned only once. These results suggest that institutional factors do play a significant role in encouraging audit firms to do high quality work. Finally, audit firms with shredded reputations experience more client turnover, although they do not earn audit fees lower than other firms. Among audit firms with shredded reputations, audit firms taking actions to improve are less likely to be dismissed by their clients and more likely to charge higher audit fees. These results have strategic implications for the regulators in emerging markets.

Shredded Reputation, Independence and Market Reaction

An empirical Evaluation of Economic Consequence of Shredded CPA Reputation

Restoring Trust among Investors after Shredded CPA Reputation: Evidence from China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Abnormal Audit Fees and the Shredded Audit Quality:Evidence from China's Public Companies

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

MARKET COMPETITION,MANAGER INCENTIVE,AND FRAUD BEHAVIOR OF LISTED COMPANIES——EVIDENCE FROM PUNISHMENT BULLETINS BY CSRC

Study on the Effectiveness of Reputation Mechanism in a Transitional Economy: Evidence from China's Audit Market

Does the Market Care Auditors' Reputation?——Evidence and implications from the case of"KeLong Electric"

Do Sanctioned Audit Firms Strive to Restore Their Damaged Reputation under Imperfect Institutional Settings?

Reputation Mechanism of Auditor: Based on the Empirical Research of Audit Firm M&A

CPA Firm's Regional Competitive Advantage and Audit Quality

The Auditors’ Reaction to the Companies’ Accounting and Financial Irregularities——Analysis of the punishment bulletins of the CRSC,SSE,and SZSE

A Re-examination of the Auditor Independence in China

Comparative Study on the Impact of Auditor Rotation Regulation

Economic Dependence and Audit Quality——The Evidence from China's Capital Market

The impact of revealing auditor partner quality: evidence from a long panel

Economic Consequence of the Revision on Audit Report Standard: Empirical Evidence from Capital Market

Auditors under Fire: the Association Between Audit Errors and the Career Setbacks of Individual Auditors

On Factors Affecting the Penalties of Audit Firms by Regulatory Authority: Evidence from Auditing Regulation of Capital Markets in China