Economic Dependence and Audit Quality——The Evidence from China's Capital Market

FANG Junxiong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9301.2007.02.010

2007-01-01

Abstract:Does the audit fee from client bring the economic dependence,and impair the independence of CPA? We give the answer to this question based on China's capital market,and we find no negative influence of audit fee to audit quality.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Chen Jun,Chen Hanwen,Wu Donghui

2010-01-01

Abstract:To understand the economic role played by independent auditing in China's transition economy and evaluate the performance of independent auditing system,it is important to investigate the demand for audit services as well as the evolution of the system. Based on the marketization reform of Initial Public Offering (IPO) in China,this paper examines the issue empirically from both the information demand and the monitoring demand perspectives. We find that,on the one hand,the demand for high-quality auditing increases with the progress of IPO marketization reform. IPO firms with lower uncertainty risk are more likely to select high-quality auditors after the implementation of authorization system. On the other hand,although the governance conflicts between managers and shareholders create the demand for high-quality auditing,the inadequacy of effective market constraint mechanisms results in governance conflicts between controlling and minority shareholders and reduces the demand for high-quality auditing. The ″absentee owner″ problem for the state controlling shareholders further weakens such a demand. Our findings suggest that the demand for high-quality auditing in China's capital market is not likely to increase unless the governance problem associated with controlling shareholders is addressed.
Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Jun Chen,Wang Dong,Shuo Li,Yu (Tony) Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2016.1208573

2016-01-01

Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics

Abstract:We examine the effect of audit quality on stock price delay and whether the effect differs between two groups of Chinese firms: state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and non-state-owned enterprises (NSOEs). Using a sample of 15,019 firm-year observations for Chinese listed firms over the period 2001-2011, we find that firms with Big 4 auditors are associated with less stock price delay and this negative association is weaker for SOEs than for NSOEs. Our findings suggest that high-quality auditors play an important role in the price formation process, in that there is less stock price delay, and this role varies across firms with different ownership structures. Additional analyses show that the audit quality of international Big 4 auditors is perceived to be different from that of domestic Big 4 auditors. The effect of the perceived audit quality on price delay is different for SOEs controlled by the central government compared to those controlled by the local governments. Our study contributes to extant research by focusing on the economic consequences of auditor choices and by emphasizing the importance of recognizing ownership type when conducting audit research.Data availability Data used are from public sources identified in this paper.
Study on Foreign Research about Auditor Quality:The Impact of Demand and Supply

CHEN Jun,MAO Zhi-zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2008.12.007

2008-01-01

Abstract:In the security market,the quality of accounting information plays an important role in resource distribution and market operation,and it is determined by auditor quality in a large extent.Generally,it is viewed as a beginning point of research on auditor quality that those investigations focus on driving factors on demand and supply aspects of auditor quality.Considering that current research about it is at the initial stage in China,this paper reviews and summarizes synthetically related foreign researches during the late 20 years.On the basis of review,we put forward some advices to the domestic future research.
Abnormal Audit Fees and the Shredded Audit Quality:Evidence from China's Public Companies

JUNXIONG FANG,JIANQIAO HONG

2008-01-01

Abstract:it is interesting whether companies succeed in opinion shopping by giving abnormal audit fee to CPA.This paper examines the association between the abnormal audit fee and the improvement of unfavorable audit opinion from period t to t+1,using a sample of Chinese listed companies during 2001—2002.We find that abnormal audit fee is significantly and positively associated with the improvement of unfavorable audit opinion,and the abnormal audit fee significantly damages the value-relevance of accounting earnings.These evidences imply that Chinese listed companies succeed in opinion shopping through the abnormal audit fee.
Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

Han Hongling,Chen Hanwen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2007.09.011

2007-01-01

Abstract:Initial audit pricing discount can have important public policy implications related with auditor independence.This paper,based on the two competitive theoretical models of DeAngelo(1981) and Dye(1991),empirically tests the pricing behavior of initial audit by using the data of Chinese security audit market of year 2002—2004.The empirical results support the usefulness of CSRC's policy that requires public companies to disclose the audit fee information in their annual reports,the potential audiuor independence problem aroused by quasi rent and pricing discount will be eliminated or mitigated as the audit fee information being disclosed.The empirical results also have an important regulatory implication:we should pay principal attentions to the auditor switch behavior of big public corporations changing their auditor between the small audit firms.
Effects of Auditing Fee on Auditing Quality: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

Huasheng Gao,Yunfei Qi,Chenxi Xu,Julie Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3300576

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper exploits a natural experiment to investigate the causal effects of the auditing fees on auditing quality: China recently imposed a minimum auditing fee requirement which forces some auditing firms to charge higher fees to their clients. We find a significant decrease in auditing quality for auditing firms affected by the rule, relative to those not affected. This effect is more pronounced when client firms are more price sensitive to auditing fees and when auditing firms face stronger competition in the auditing market. Our evidence supports the economic theory of auditor independence: a higher auditing fee impairs auditor independence and thus causes a decrease in auditing quality.
Regulated Changes in Audit Fee Disclosure and Improvement of Audit Environment:Evidence from China's Auditing Market

Junxiong F

2009-01-01

Abstract:The 2001 regulated disclosure of audit fee in China could have improve the audit environment or harm it.Consistent with the audit environment improvement hypothesis, the companies audited by local CPAs had higher cumulated abnormal return around the rule promulgation than the companies audited by international CPAs,and the audit fee and audit quality of local CPAs had improved relative to international CPAs after the rule promulgation.
Abnormal Audit Fees, Audit Market Concentration and Audit Quality

Xinran Wang,Yun Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/ajbm.2023.051009

2023-01-01

Academic Journal of Business & Management

Abstract:The problem of abnormal audit fees in the audit market is more prevalent.To study the impact on audit quality, China's A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2013 to 2020 were selected as the research objects, and the abnormal audit fees calculated using the pricing model were split into positive abnormal audit fees and negative abnormal audit fees, and the relationship between them and audit quality was analyzed using a regression model, and on this basis, the audit market was examined.The study also examines the mediating effect of concentration in the relationship between negative abnormal audit fees and audit quality.The study shows that abnormal audit fees are significantly and negatively related to audit quality regardless of whether they are high or low, and that audit market concentration plays a partially mediating role in the relationship between negative abnormal audit fees and audit quality, with the lower abnormal fees, the lower the audit market concentration and the higher the audit quality.The study provides new ideas and policy recommendations for the classic problem of abnormal audit fees and audit quality from the perspective of audit market concentration.
An empirical Evaluation of Economic Consequence of Shredded CPA Reputation

Junxiong Fang,Ping Xu,Jianqiao Hong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6249.2006.06.008

2006-01-01

Abstract:Audit is useful mechanism to improve the credibility of accounting information and release agency cost, and it depends on the quality of audit. So we wonder whether shredded reputation of CPA damage the credibility of audit and the quality of accounting information. This paper gives some evidence from China.
Audit Fees and Auditor Choice in Different Levels of Marketization——Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

JIANG De-quan,SHEN Yong-jian,WANG Guo-jun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13781/j.cnki.1007-9556.2011.12.012

2011-01-01

Abstract:This paper includes 5934 listed companies from 2005 to 2009 to investigate how the levels of marketization affects the audit fees and auditor choice.The authors find that,with the improvement in the level of marketization,both Big 4 auditors and non-Big 4 auditors charge more,but the differential fees between them will reduce.Additional analysis suggests that state-owned enterprises(SEO) tend to choose Big 4 auditors partly due to the narrowing gap between Big 4 and non-Big 4 fees.The findings contribute to further understanding the institutional corporate governance in transition economy like China.
Study on Economic Consequences of Deregulation in China's Audit Market: Evidence from B-share Audit Market

FANG Jun-xiong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2010.07.013

2010-01-01

Abstract:The paper studies the effect of deregulation of dual audit in B-share market on audit market efficiency.The results show that,on the whole,investors do not actively respond to it.However,the market reaction of companies with the same group audit mode is better than the one of companies with the different group audit modes.Furthermore,the majority of B-share companies quit dual-audit model and the audit fees decrease greatly after the policy comes into effect.And audit qualities and information environment of companies applying different group audit modes deteriorate after the deregulation,but audit qualities and information environment of companies applying the same group audit mode have no significant changes.
Does individual auditor quality contribute to firm value? Evidence from the market valuation on corporate cash holdings

Nan-Ting Kuo,Shu Li,Ya-Guang Du,Cheng-Few Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.001

2022-05-01

Abstract:Our study investigates whether individual auditor quality contributes to firm value through enhancing the market valuation on corporate cash holdings. Specifically, high audit quality improves financial reporting quality that facilitates external monitoring, which deters managerial misuse and thus enhances the value of cash holdings. By exploring Chinese listed companies, we find that industry expertise at the individual auditor-level enhances the value of cash holdings, while such effect presents after controlling for audit firm-level industry expertise. Moreover, the effect of individual auditor-level industry expertise is mediated via financial reporting quality, and its effect is more pronounced when media coverage is high, when the engagement auditor is a partner, and when the economic importance of the audited client is low. Overall, our results suggest that investors recognize that expertise knowledge gained at individual auditor-level is not fully transferable among audit firms so individual auditor quality provides incremental informational value than does audit firm quality. Our study contributes to auditing literature and the policy debates about mandatory name disclosure of engagement auditors.

economics,business, finance
Does Audit Quality Matter to Credit Rating in China Corporate Bond Market

Chen Chao,Li Rongyi

2013-01-01

Abstract:Recently,bond market development has become one of the most important strategies of capital market reform in China.Under such circumstance,this paper studies the relations of audit quality and credit rating.Credit rating serves as a basis for determining credit risk and bond price.Credit rating agency could use audited accounting information to decide rating grade of a certain firm.With the increase of audit quality,accounting information is more accurate and the insurance provided by the audit firm is more beneficial,which leads to lower information asymmetry, hence higher bonds' rating and issuers' rating.We use the corporate bond issued from 2007 to 2011 as the sample to study the relationship of audit quality and credit rating,considering bond terms,issuers' characteristic and corporate governance factors bankruptcy at the same time.Our empirical analysis shows that a bond or an issuer with better audit quality,the issuer' s bond rating or issuers' rating tends to be higher,and these relationships tend to be lower in state-owned enterprises and central government controlled firms.
On Factors Affecting the Penalties of Audit Firms by Regulatory Authority: Evidence from Auditing Regulation of Capital Markets in China

CHEN Xiao,QIU Yu-fang,XU Yong-xin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2011.06.012

2011-01-01

Abstract:By investigating auditing regulation behavior of China Securities Regulatory Commission(CSRC),this paper finds that the quality of clients and the expertise of audit firms are the important factors that affecting the penalties of audit firms by regulatory authority.Audit firms whose clients have higher average profitability and lower account receivables have less probability of penalties by CSRC.At the same time,audit firms with higher industry concentration are less likely to encounter the penalties by CSRC.The results are robust with or without Big 4 audit firms,and do not vary with measurement methods of variables or regulation mechanisms of CSRC.
Financial Distress, Investment Opportunity, and the Contagion Effect of Low Audit Quality: Evidence from China

Xingqiang Du,Shaojuan Lai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2986-5

IF: 6.331

2015-12-21

Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract:Using the presence of at least one client with net-income-increasing misstatement as a signal of low audit quality for an audit firm, this study examines the existence of the contagion effect of low audit quality and further investigates whether financial distress and investment opportunity as two firm-specific financial characteristics moderate the contagion effect of low audit quality. Using a sample of 7887 firm-year observations from the Chinese stock market over the period of 2007–2012, our study documents strong and consistent evidence to show that (1) other clients audited by low-quality audit firms have significantly higher discretionary accruals (the existence of the contagion effect); (2) financial distress reinforces the contagion effect of low audit quality; (3) investment opportunity strengthens the contagion effect of low audit quality; (4) the contagion effect of low audit quality persists over subsequent years for clients, and both financial distress and investment opportunity reinforce the contagion effect of misstatement to future misstatement. Above results are robust to a variety of sensitivity tests and are still valid after using the change model to control for the potential endogeneity. This study extends the previous literature on the contagion effect of low audit quality (misstatement) across audit firms.

business,ethics
IPO-Audit Expertise, Audit Quality, and Capital Allocation Efficiency: Evidence from China

Donghui Wu,Zhifeng Yang,Feiteng Ye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3876506

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Backed by China's economic growth, the initial public offering (IPO) market in China has been one of the most vigorous in the world. In this market, practicing auditors routinely sit on the regulatory committee responsible for screening prospective IPO firms. Against this backdrop, we examine whether IPO-audit expertise can influence IPO-audit quality and capital allocation. We find that auditors with richer IPO-audit experience improve the quality of earnings in IPO prospectus, earn an audit fee premium, and are significantly more likely to be assigned to IPO engagements by audit firms or appointed to the regulatory committee by regulators. We also show that, by enhancing the credibility of information disclosure in IPO prospectus, IPO exper-tise of the regulatory committee members and the IPO engagement auditors improves capital allocation efficiency. Collectively, our evidence implies that a more sophisticated audit profes-sion can contribute to the development of capital market in a country.
Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China

Manoj Athavale,Zhaorui Guo,Yun Meng,Tianshu Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.12.020

2022-03-01

Abstract:We examine whether the diversity of signing auditors affects audit quality of listed firms in China. Using the Blau's index of diversity measure based on eight characteristics of signing auditors and a series of audit quality proxies, including modified audit opinions (MAO), restatement of annual financial reports (Restate), and discretionary accruals (DA), we document a negative relationship between the diversity of signing auditors and firms' audit quality. Additional analyses show that corporate governance, signing auditor and audit firm characteristics moderate the relationship between the diversity of signing auditors and audit quality. Our findings suggest that reducing the diversity of signing auditors is an effective way to improve audit quality.

economics,business, finance
Does joining global accounting firm networks and associations affect audit quality and audit pricing? Evidence from China

Wei Li,Huilong Liu,Xizi Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1824115

IF: 2.326

2020-10-26

Accounting and Business Research

Abstract:This study investigates the impact of accounting firms joining global accounting firm networks and associations (AF N&As) on audit quality and audit pricing in China. We find that after their accounting firms join global AF N&As, client firms' accrual-based earnings management is reduced. However, we find no evidence that audit fees are significantly affected. Cross-sectional analysis suggests that improvements in audit quality resulting from accounting firms joining global AF N&As are more pronounced when auditors have less audit experience, clients have more subsidiaries or auditor tenure is shorter. Additional tests suggest that joining AF N&As reduces the likelihood of accounting firms being dismissed by clients and increases the market share of the accounting firms.

business, finance
Impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees: Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Ming Cheng,Chonlavit Sutunyarak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.53

2023-09-20

Problems and Perspectives in Management

Abstract:High economic policy uncertainty in China amplifies operational risks and managerial pressure for businesses while driving the demand for independent audits. However, previous studies have paid limited attention to the impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees. This study aims to examine the impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees and to test whether the internal control quality will moderate this association at the firm level. This study employs the economic policy uncertainty index to measure uncertainty. The paper examines 3,469 Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2020, using STATA 17 for fixed-effects regression on panel data. The results show a robust positive association between economic policy uncertainty and audit fees (β = 0.0302, p &lt; 0.001). However, this association is weaker for companies with better internal control quality (β = –0.0229, p &lt; 0.001), suggesting that effective internal controls can mitigate the impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees. Furthermore, the findings indicate that this positive association is weaker for state-owned companies compared to non-state-owned companies (β = –0.0170, p &lt; 0.001). At the same time, the study does not establish a significant difference in the positive association between TOP 10 and non-TOP 10 accounting firms. This study examines the adverse effects of economic policy uncertainty from the perspective of audit fees. The results have implications for stakeholders, including the need for companies to establish effective internal controls and good government-business relationships and for governments to reduce economic policy uncertainty and increase transparency in their policies.

English Else
Study on the Effectiveness of Reputation Mechanism in a Transitional Economy: Evidence from China's Audit Market

Junxiong Fang

2011-01-01

Abstract:Reputation mechanism is one of basic mechanisms supporting the orderly function of market economy.This paper systematically tests the effectiveness of reputation mechanism in China from the angle of audit market.The results show that,after CPAs' reputations are compromised,they obviously improve their audit qualities and the audit market responds positively,that is to say CPAs who improve their audit qualities suffer fewer client losses and collect higher audit fees.It reconfirms the constraint of professional reputation in China,illustrating the governance value of professional reputation mechanism of audit independence in emerging markets.

Economic Dependence and Audit Quality——The Evidence from China's Capital Market

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Study on Foreign Research about Auditor Quality:The Impact of Demand and Supply

Abnormal Audit Fees and the Shredded Audit Quality:Evidence from China's Public Companies

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

Effects of Auditing Fee on Auditing Quality: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

Regulated Changes in Audit Fee Disclosure and Improvement of Audit Environment:Evidence from China's Auditing Market

Abnormal Audit Fees, Audit Market Concentration and Audit Quality

An empirical Evaluation of Economic Consequence of Shredded CPA Reputation

Audit Fees and Auditor Choice in Different Levels of Marketization——Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Study on Economic Consequences of Deregulation in China's Audit Market: Evidence from B-share Audit Market

Does individual auditor quality contribute to firm value? Evidence from the market valuation on corporate cash holdings

Does Audit Quality Matter to Credit Rating in China Corporate Bond Market

On Factors Affecting the Penalties of Audit Firms by Regulatory Authority: Evidence from Auditing Regulation of Capital Markets in China

Financial Distress, Investment Opportunity, and the Contagion Effect of Low Audit Quality: Evidence from China

IPO-Audit Expertise, Audit Quality, and Capital Allocation Efficiency: Evidence from China

Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China

Does joining global accounting firm networks and associations affect audit quality and audit pricing? Evidence from China

Impact of economic policy uncertainty on audit fees: Evidence from Chinese listed companies

Study on the Effectiveness of Reputation Mechanism in a Transitional Economy: Evidence from China's Audit Market