Abstract:In this study, we leverage a comprehensive dataset of over 3.8 million bid entries from institutional investors participating in China's capital market to investigate the determinants of heterogeneous bidding behavior among these investors and the subsequent economic outcomes. We evaluate the sustainability of initial public offering (IPO) performance through three interrelated metrics: post-IPO stock price performance, financial accounting performance, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Our analysis reveals a pronounced positive association between the quality of firms' pre-IPO and the recent reforms to the bookbuilding mechanism in China's capital market, as well as the level of diversity in institutional investors' bidding opinions. After accounting for these factors, we focus on the nexus between the diversity of bidding opinions and the sustainability of IPO performance. The empirical evidence indicates that a higher degree of diversity in bidding opinions is inversely related to firms' post-IPO stock price performance, financial accounting performance, and ESG performance. Further mechanism tests suggest that this diversity leads to a depletion of medium- to long-term share price performance by intensifying market sentiment; impedes the enhancement of financial accounting performance by reducing the capital raised during the IPO; and negatively impacts ESG performance by constraining the firm's ability to fulfill its corporate social responsibilities. These findings challenge the assumption that diversity of opinion is always beneficial. The insights gained from this research have significant implications for the sustainable growth strategies of listed companies in emerging markets.

IPO-Audit Expertise, Audit Quality, and Capital Allocation Efficiency: Evidence from China

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

IPO Offer Price Regulation, Financial Reporting Quality, and IPO Overpricing

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Audit quality and earnings management for China IPO firms

IPO pricing deregulation and corporate governance: Theory and evidence from Chinese public firms

IPO Pricing Efficiency and Ownership Structure: Evidence from China

Rent-seeking Motivation and Auditing Market:Evidence from IPO Private Firms

The IPO underwriting market share in China: Do ownership and quality matter?

The Ultimate Shareholders' Control, Private Equity Capital and IPO Underpricing:Empirical Evidence from China's Small and Medium-sized Board IPO Companies

Initial Public Offering, Corporate Innovation and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

The long-run performance of initial public offerings and its determinants: the case of China

Earnings Management, Underwriter Reputation, and Marketization: Evidence from IPO Market in China

Accounting Conservatism and IPO Underpricing: China Evidence

Informativeness of the Expanded Audit Report: Evidence from China

Ownership, Underwriting Quality, and the IPO Market Share of Investment Banks: Evidence from China

The Legal Environments, Audit Quality and Initial Return——Evidence from Chinese SOEs

The consequence of audit failure on audit firms: evidence from IPO approval in China

Can Market-oriented Reform Improve Pricing Efficiency in China? Evidence from Registration-based IPO System

Peer Effects of Corporate Disclosures: Evidence From the Registration-Based IPO System in China

Diversity of Institutional Investors' Bidding Opinions in Shaping the Sustainability of IPO Performance