Abstract:Academic journal is an important medium of research publication and academic exchange.The academic journal evaluation system in China has been initially established,but quality and innovativeness evaluations are still weak.There are profound socio-economic,cultural,administrative reasons for this problem,which have caused negative impact on the value orientation of scholars and their research behavior,affected the objectivity and impartiality of academic evaluation,and undermined the cleanness and pureness of the academia. Scholars of the humanities and social sciences and library and information science experts have already reached a consensus that academic evaluation in the humanities and social sciences should be more diverse,localized and content-based,and there should be quality and innovativeness evaluations.In the past dozen years,academic journal evaluation is mainly quantitative and formal,but now more emphasis should be placed on content evaluation and innovativeness evaluation to create a fair and free environment for academic journal evaluation. On the premise of maintaining the reasonable elements in the existing academic journal evaluation system,this article proposes a combination of three new concepts including formal evaluation,content evaluation and effectiveness evaluation,and puts forward a new evaluation method integrating peer-review and bibliometric evaluation.The proposed combination of the three new concepts would be able to explain the history and the current situation of journal evaluation,and also predict its future.The aim of the new thinking and the approach to realize it is to overcome the institutional obstacles that hinder the healthy development of academic evaluation,to establish a fair and rational academic environment for scholars,and to create an open and constructive academic environment in the future.

The Third Party Evaluation: The Reform of Quality Assurance System of Universities in Japan

A Study on Setting Up the Quality Assurance Mechanism of Higher Education Self-study Examination

The Comparison of the Characteristics of Higher Education's Quality Evaluation and the Evaluation Mechanism of Social Agency Between China and Japan

Establishing External Quality Assurance Mechanisms of Postgraduate Education:Experiences and Implications from the United Kingdom

Development of the Third-Party Assessment System for Education Quality Based on Public Trust

Evaluation of Universities in China:An Institutionalist Analysis

The Inquiry into the Method of Three-Step Process of Assessment in Higher Education

Building a System of "student Three Evaluation" Based on the Perceptive Quality of Students

A Review and Analysis of Problems with Program Evaluation in Chinese Colleges and Universities

Students' Participation in Quality Evaluation of Higher Education

Discussion on the Construction of Higher Education Evaluation System with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era

On evaluation of tertiary and vocational colleges in China--Some comments about current university rank

The Undergraduate Teaching Evaluation System in China: Progress, Problems and Suggestions

Competitive Selection and Quality Maintenance——Transformation and Status Quo for the Entrance Examination of Japanese University in the Background of Popularization

Quality and Innovativeness in the Evaluation of Academic Journals

Quality Assurance of Doctoral Education in Chinese Universities:Institutional and Cultural Analysis

Differences and Enlightenment of Higher Education Evaluation System between China and America

Reflections on the External Quality Assurance System of Graduate Education

A review of higher education reform in modern Japan

Thoughts about initiating the teaching quality evaluation of postgraduate courses in face of the new century

Building "student - Centered" Quality Evaluation System of Undergraduate Education: Practice and Thinking on the Handbook of "indicators of Good Practice"