Clinical efficacy and influencing factor analysis of microvascular decompression for primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia
郑文韬,刘佳雨,郝庆沛,高夏苗,武广永,方继侠,欧阳佳,张子豪,范存刚,刘如恩
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20220120-00044
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the effectiveness, safety and factors influencing the efficacy of microvascular decompression for the treatment of primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN).Methods:The clinical data of 61 patients with GPN who underwent microvascular decompression at the Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University People′s Hospital from January 2014 to November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity scale was applied to assess the pain degree of all patients before and after treatment. Friedman′s test and Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test were used to analyze the changes in pain level before and after surgery. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to explore the potential factors affecting postoperative pain relief, and a regression model was established. Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to evaluate the goodness of fit of the model.Results:Among the 61 patients, 52 patients (85.2%) had complete relief of pain immediately after surgery, 4 patients (6.6%) had significant relief, 3 patients (4.9%) had partial relief, and 2 patients (3.3%) had no relief. Two years after operation, 41 cases (67.2%) of pain were completely relieved, 7 cases (11.5%) were significantly relieved, 9 cases (14.7%) were partially relieved, and 4 cases (6.6%) were not relieved. The BNI pain intensity scores of patients immediately after operation and 2 years after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation, and the differences were statistically significant (both P<0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that low-grade neurovascular compression ( OR=9.29, 95% CI: 1.87-46.15, P=0.006) and venous compression ( OR=10.53, 95% CI: 1.91-58.22, P=0.007) were independent risk factors for pain relief after MVD for GPN. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that the model based on independent risk factors had a good fit ( χ2=0.56, P=0.453). Permanent complications occurred in 4 patients (6.6%), including 2 patients (3.3%) with pharyngeal foreign body sensation, 1 patient (1.6%) with hoarseness, and 1 patient (1.6%) with ipsilateral mild hearing loss. Conclusions:Microvascular decompression can effectively and safely relieve the pain symptoms of GPN patients, but there is a certain probability of recurrence. Patients with GPN with mild neurovascular compression and venous compression are less likely to experience pain relief after microvascular decompression.