Comparison of Neurocombing and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in the Treatment of Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

董晓巧,俞文华,杜权,孙建良,俞良,李庆华,朱强,王昊,车志豪,杨定博,沈永锋,江力
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11969/j.issn.1673-548X.2017.05.027
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare clinical effectiveness of neurocombing (NC) and percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF) in the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia and evaluate its clinical significance.Methods Thirty seven patients with trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular compression and undergoing neurocombing (NC group) and 37 trigeminal neuralgia patients obtaining percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF group) were given 3-year follow-up.Postoperative effectiveness rate,recurrence rate and occurrence rate of facial numbness were recorded and compared in the two groups of patients.Results In the NC group and RF group,postoperative 3-year effectiveness rate was 78.4% (29/37) and 73.0% (27/37) respectively.Postoperative 3-year recurrence rate was 21.6% (8/37) and 27.0% (10/37) respectively,as well as postoperative occurrence rate of facial numbness was 91.9% (34/ 37) and 100% (37/37).All intergroup differences were not statistically significant (P all > 0.05).Conclusion NC and RF are both satisfactory treatment strategies for patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia.When taking into account the risk of craniotomy,RF is preferable to NC in some elderly patients with trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular compression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?