Comparison of Dynamic and Constrained Cervical Plates: an Ex Vivo Experimental Study in Porcine Model

SHANG Peng,LIU Wei-qiang,Wang Guan-zhi,Guy R Fogel,PENG Jiang,QUO Quan-yi
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To investigate whether the dynamic anterior cervical plate behaves better than the constrainedanterior cervical plate using biomechanical testing in 18 porcine specimens. Methods Three kinds of cervical plating system(Peak?, Swift?, and Premier?) were used to represent the constrained and dynamic plate, respectively. Eighteen porcinecervical spines were potted from C2 to C7 in a neutral position. A two level corpectomy was made. A height-adjustable plasticgraft using a subminiature load cell was placed in the corpectomy defect. Each of three plates was tested in six spines underthree conditions. Plate and strut-graft loads were computed in physiologic range of motion with load control under displacementconditions. Results In motion limits loading there was no significant difference in graft load with optimal graft height betweenthe constrained and dynamic plates. There were significant decreases in graft loads with the undersized graft in all threeplates. Plate loading was decreased with the undersized graft in the dynamic plates. The effect of the under-sized graft wasless decreased in graft loading and less increased in plate loading with the dynamic plate. In load limited 4.5Nm testing with theoptimal length graft, the Swift plate maintained reasonable load sharing while the Premier plate load increased 300%. In loadlimited with the undersized graft, the Premier had a more reasonable load sharing than the Swift plate. Conclusions Thedynamic plate is considered biomechanically advantageous in two-level corpectomy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?