The Analysis of the Outcomes of the Posterior Approach along the Femoral Neck Minimal Incision Total Hip Replacement
LI Xin,WANG Jin-cheng,GAO Zhong-li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-5572.2009.07.005
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective Nowadays,the minimal incision total hip replacement(THR) has been considered to be one approach of the minimally invasive surgery.There are arguments about it in the orthopedics society.There are few domestic systematic compared studies about the minimal incision and the traditional THR.The objective of this study is to compare the short results between the minimal incision and the tradition THR.Methods 60 patients who need the THR are the objects of this study(30 with lateral minimal incision and 30 with standard incision).The data which were collected are about:age,gender,hip(left/right),weight,height,body mass index,blood loss,blood transfusion,operation time,incision length,complication,prosthesis position,time of use walking aids,the Harris hip score pre and after the operation.All the patients accepted the general anesthesia.Every patient received the same anticoagulant therapy post operation.All of them were encouraged to play an active role in the rehabilitation.The mean follow up time is 13 months(6 months to 24 months).The numeration data were tested with chi square test.The measurement data are tested with t test,P<0.05 means the difference is significant.Results There were no significant difference between the mini-incision group and the standard incision group about the body mass index,Harris hip score and complication incidence(P>0.05).The minimal incision group was found to have a significantly advantages of incision length,operation time,blood loss,length of hospital stay,time of use walking aids(P<0.05).The prosthesis position indicated on the radiotelegram was quite well.There was no dislocation,coxa vara or valga,the mean abduction angle of acetabular cup was 45.5°(43°to 48°);the mean anteversion angle was 17.7°(16°to22°).Conclusion The result of the early follow up of this study confirmed that the minimal incision THR didn′t increase the risk incidence of the complications and the promise positions of the prosthesis compared with the standard THR(P>0.05).The minimal incision THR could reduce the blood loss and the hospital stay of the patients,speed the rehabilitation to achieve function goal without increase the risk of the complications.But the surgeons who want to perform THR with this minimally invasive technique must be familiar with the regional anatomy and have already mastered the standard THR.