Extraction of Iodine from I-bearing Palygorskite from Linze, Gansu and Research on Its Occurrence

YE Ying,LI Jun,ZHANG Yun-peng,CHEN Xue-gang,ZHANG Wei-rui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2006.02.008
2006-01-01
Abstract:The results of XRD analysis and whole pattern fitting quantitative calculation indicate that the sample for this study from Linze,Gansu is composed of palygorskite 70.1%,ankerite 15.7%,quartz 6.6% and a small amount of muscovite,albite and chlorite.Various methods were deployed to extract iodine from the ore.Heating-sublimation method extracted no iodine,illuminating that the occurrence of iodine in palygorskite is ionic rather than molecular.Hot water soaking can only extract an extraordinarily small quantity of iodine,about 0.76 to 2.05 μ g/g of the ore,indicating that the binding strength between iodine and palygorskite is exceedingly high,and the iodine is rather difficult to be activated by hot water.Iodine extracted from palygorskite by hydrochloric acid soaking were in the range of 190.4 to 320.5 μ g/g,positively related with the dipping time,but hardly affected by temperature.In the acid soaking period of 40 h,the correlated curve between extracted amount of iodine and time is in S-shape,i.e.,with a gentle initial and terminal,but a steep middle.The S-shape releasing curve indicates that iodine is predominantly from palygorskite,contribution of another major mineral phase dolomite is negligible,for that the later is dissolved in HCl solution very soon.The releasing curve also indicates that most of the absorbed iodine in palygorskite occurred in its intracrystal tunnel space,instead of on the external surface of the mineral.The high extracted ratio achieved by hydrochloric acid is related with the low acid stability of palygorskite.Releasing of iodine from the carrier took place simultaneously with the dissolution of the mineral.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?