Abstract:Background: The recent advancement of microarray technology with lower noise and better affordability makes it possible to determine expression of several thousand genes simultaneously. The differentially expressed genes are filtered first and then clustered based on the expression profiles of the genes. A large number of clustering algorithms and distance measuring matrices are proposed in the literature. The popular ones among them include hierarchal clustering and k-means clustering. These algorithms have often used the Euclidian distance or Pearson correlation distance. The biologists or the practitioners are often confused as to which algorithm to use since there is no clear winner among algorithms or among distance measuring metrics. Several validation indices have been proposed in the literature and these are based directly or indirectly on distances; hence a method that uses any of these indices does not relate to any biological features such as biological processes or molecular functions. Results: In this paper we have proposed a metric to measure the effectiveness of clustering algorithms of genes by computing inter-cluster cohesiveness and as well as the intra-cluster separation with respect to biological features such as biological processes or molecular functions. We have applied this metric to the clusters on the data set that we have created as part of a larger study to determine the cancer suppressive mechanism of a class of chemicals called retinoids.We have considered hierarchal and k-means clustering with Euclidian and Pearson correlation distances. Our results show that genes of similar expression profiles are more likely to be closely related to biological processes than they are to molecular functions. The findings have been supported by many works in the area of gene clustering. Conclusion: The best clustering algorithm of genes must achieve cohesiveness within a cluster with respect to some biological features, and as well as maximum separation between clusters in terms of the distribution of genes of a behavioral group across clusters. We claim that our proposed metric is novel in this respect and that it provides a measure of both inter and intra cluster cohesiveness. Best of all, computation of the proposed metric is easy and it provides a single quantitative value, which makes comparison of different algorithms easier. The maximum cluster cohesiveness and the maximum intra-cluster separation are indicated by the metric when its value is 0.We have demonstrated the metric by applying it to a data set with gene behavioral groupings such as biological process and molecular functions. The metric can be easily extended to other features of a gene such as DNA binding sites and protein-protein interactions of the gene product, special features of the intron-exon structure, promoter characteristics, etc. The metric can also be used in other domains that use two different parametric spaces; one for clustering and the other one for measuring the effectiveness.

A new measure of R-type cluster based on Gamma-test

Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm Based On A New Measure

Identity Tests for High Dimensional Data Using Rmt

Testing for a difference in means of a single feature after clustering

An Information-Theoretic External Cluster-Validity Measure

A New Measurement of Similarity and Related Clustering Algorithm

On the Index of Cluster Validity

A rough set based clustering algorithm and the information theoretical approach to refine clusters

Metric for measuring the effectiveness of clustering of DNA microarray expression

Gamma-based clustering via ordered means with application to gene-expression analysis

Graph Sensitive Indices for Comparing Clusterings

Post-clustering difference testing: Valid inference and practical considerations with applications to ecological and biological data

Wilcoxon Rank-Based Tests for Clustered Data with R Package clusrank

A new validity measure for fuzzy c-means clustering

J-Score: A Robust Measure of Clustering Accuracy

Comparison on Bayesian Ying-Yang Theory Based Clustering Number Selection Criterion with Information Theoretical Criteria

Measuring the Clustering Strength of a Network via the Normalized Clustering Coefficient

Gene Ranking Using R-Metric

Adjusting for Chance Clustering Comparison Measures

A Comparative Study of Novel Robust Clustering Algorithms

A New Distance Measure for Hidden Markov Models