Can Audit Mechanism Play an Effective Role in the Charity?

Zhang Limin,Cao Limei,Li han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2012.02.010

2012-01-01

Abstract:Charity donation is an important component of non-profit organizations compared to public hospitals and schools.Empirical research of the audit mechanisms has important implications for non-profit organizations.Foreign research results show that the charity also exist agency cost.In order to reduce internal agency cost,charity donation will be introducing external supervision mechanism,such as Audit Mechanism.Various external and internal management mechanism are not perfect,therefore,the current external audit may have an effective role.Using data from 2005 to 2009 of national charity in China,we analyze the relationship between external auditor selection and charity donation,that is,in China’s charitable market,whether the governance role of external audit is effective and how it plays.We put the audit firm into two kinds: bidders of Ministry of Civil Affairs and national Big 100,investigation whose audit quality is higher and has an effective role.Empirical evidence suggests that,when charities select national Big100 as the auditors,the governance role of audit plays effectively,thus attracts more donators.When charities select successful bidders of Ministry of Civil Affairs as the auditors,the governance role of audit can’t play effectively,thus won’t increase donation significantly.To some extent,the above conclusion suggests Governance effect of the external audit exists and its effects depends on the effective management of high quality audit,at the same time,the above conclusions can also be for the government regulation of charitable donation and benefit the public who choose the reliable charity donation.From the above research,in order to improve China's audit market,we must keep reducing the gap with international audit,improve the auditing quality and suggest that Ministry of Civil Affairs bidding audit firms should take audit quality as the primary of the evaluation standard.